2002
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a monomorphic seabird

Abstract: Sexual differences in the foraging behaviour of parents have been observed in a number of sexually sizedimorphic birds, particularly seabirds, and the usual inference has been that these sex-specific differences are mediated primarily by differences in body size. To test this explanation, we compared the foraging behaviour of parents in a monomorphic seabird species, the northern gannet Morus bassanus. Using specially designed instruments and radio telemetry we found that individuals of both sexes were consist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
257
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
14
257
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex-related differences in foraging areas are commonly observed among flying seabirds, and have been attributed to the differences in flight morphology or to differing reproductive roles between the sexes (González-Solís et al 2000, Shaffer et al 2001, Lewis et al 2002, Phillips et al 2004b. Although male streaked shearwaters are 1.2 times heavier and have larger bodies than females (Arima & Sugawa 2004, Ochi et al 2010, foraging areas differed between the sexes only during pre-laying and not during incubation.…”
Section: Sex-related Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-related differences in foraging areas are commonly observed among flying seabirds, and have been attributed to the differences in flight morphology or to differing reproductive roles between the sexes (González-Solís et al 2000, Shaffer et al 2001, Lewis et al 2002, Phillips et al 2004b. Although male streaked shearwaters are 1.2 times heavier and have larger bodies than females (Arima & Sugawa 2004, Ochi et al 2010, foraging areas differed between the sexes only during pre-laying and not during incubation.…”
Section: Sex-related Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is often linked to sexual size dimorphism, but also occurs in species with males and females of similar size (Lewis et al 2002). Male Magellanic penguins are slightly larger than females and are at sea a few weeks earlier during incubation (Boersma et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thick-billed murres Uria lomvia: Woo et al 1999; northern gannets Morus bassanus: Lewis et al 2002; common guillemots Uria aalge: Thaxter et al 2009). These differences are unlikely to have been mediated by body size, and could alternatively be explained by avoidance of inter-sexual competition for food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%