Background: The need for repeat transplant due to failing kidney allografts is increasing over time. The benefit of preemptive kidney re-transplant (PKre-T) is controversial. Marginalized populations are less likely to undergo their first transplant pre-emptively, however whether inequities exist for those undergoing PKre-T is unknown. Methods: We performed a cohort study of adult patients undergoing live and deceased kidney transplant in the US from 2000-2018, identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and identified patients with first preemptive kidney transplant (PKT) and PKre-T. In the primary analysis, a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PKre-T. In secondary analyses, multivariable Cox models were used to determine the association of PKre-T with death-censored and all-cause graft loss. Results: 4,910 (15.5%) patients underwent PKre-T and 43,293 (19.1%) underwent first preemptive kidney transplant. Inequities in access to PKre-T persisted (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.44-0.55 for unemployed versus full time; OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.25 for graduate school versus not completing high school; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52-0.70 for black versus white race). 7.1% of all transplanted black patients received PKre-T versus 17.4% of white patients. Females were more likely to undergo PKre-T than males (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.29-1.57). PKre-T was associated with superior graft survival relative to retransplant after a period of dialysis (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.80 for all-cause graft failure; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81 for death-censored graft loss). Conclusion: Despite improved patient and graft survival, inequities in access to PKre-T persist. Patients with lower education, reduced employment status, black race and male sex are less likely to receive PKre-T.