2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97923-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-differences in the effect of obstructive sleep apnea on patients hospitalized with pulmonary embolism and on in-hospital mortality

Abstract: We determined sex differences in the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients hospitalized with pulmonary embolism (PE) in Spain (2016–2018). We also compared outcomes according to the presence of OSA, and identified variables associated with in-hospital-mortality (IHM) after PE using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database. We identified 46,794 hospital admissions for PE; of these, 5.47% had OSA. OSA was more prevalent among men than women (7.57% vs. 3.65%, p < 0.001), as in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several limitations to the present review. First, despite including several new studies ( 9 , 10 , 15-17 ) as compared with a previous review ( 11 ), the total number of studies in the present review was not very high. A significant limitation was the difference in the reporting of outcomes by the studies which significantly restricted the number of studies in each meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are several limitations to the present review. First, despite including several new studies ( 9 , 10 , 15-17 ) as compared with a previous review ( 11 ), the total number of studies in the present review was not very high. A significant limitation was the difference in the reporting of outcomes by the studies which significantly restricted the number of studies in each meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…After evaluation of full-texts 11 were excluded as they did not satisfy the inclusion criteria. Finally, 12 studies were included in the present review (8)(9)(10)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations