2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41256-020-00133-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals

Abstract: Purpose: To ascertain whether sex differences exist in the relationship between marital status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), cancer and all-cause mortality in the general population and to explore the potential effect of age, location, the duration of follow-up and publication years on these outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception through to April 2018 and review of references to obtain sex-specific relative risks and their 95%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
53
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, our results on gender and marital status replicate findings from previous infectious disease outbreaks 3,15 and the current COVID-19 pandemic (based on both an international and a South Korean sample 8,10 ). These findings echo a broader pattern of risk that has emerged in epidemiological research, whereby being female and being married has been linked to the reduced risk of disease and of all-cause mortality 16 . Adding to this body of research, our findings highlight how being willing to adopt health-promoting behaviours during a pandemic may contribute to the resilience of these demographic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Collectively, our results on gender and marital status replicate findings from previous infectious disease outbreaks 3,15 and the current COVID-19 pandemic (based on both an international and a South Korean sample 8,10 ). These findings echo a broader pattern of risk that has emerged in epidemiological research, whereby being female and being married has been linked to the reduced risk of disease and of all-cause mortality 16 . Adding to this body of research, our findings highlight how being willing to adopt health-promoting behaviours during a pandemic may contribute to the resilience of these demographic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Ethnicity was categorized as ‘Han’ (majority ethnic group in China), and ‘other ethnicities’ (respondents who belong to the remaining ethnicities) 6 . Sex was categorized as either male or female, and marital status was grouped as either married or unmarried 16 . Area of residence was classified into urban or rural areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oth-ers disagree and believe that there is a significant association between stress and marital status, thus the marital status of an individual can be a source of stress due to the responsibility and pressure on an individual (Nyamwata et al, 2017). Married workers are more stressed than unmarried workers (Ghafoor et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2015;APA, 2010) and Huda reports that, married nurses have a 74.6% of work related stress (WRS), Yet another school of thought is of the view that, single or unmarried workers are more stress than the married (Howells et al, 2020) and unmarried nurses are at higher risk of heart diseases and cancer (Siddiqui et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2020;Fuente et al, 2018a) even a category of singles (windowed or divorced) have a significantly higher stress level than the married due to emotional distress (Young . This is because married men tend to have a friend to aid in stress relief and women tend to have a provider to aid in relief (Kohen & Kaplan, 2016).…”
Section: Marital Status and Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%