2018
DOI: 10.1177/0265407518793533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese: A meta-analysis

Abstract: Although several studies support evolutionary perspectives on sex differences in romantic attachment, these sex differences in East Asia remain controversial. To estimate the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults, a meta-analysis of sex differences was conducted in the present study. This meta-analysis was based on 111 samples using the Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale and its revised version. The findings suggest that the effect size of sex d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the influence of culture should also be considered in the study of attachment and interpersonal relationships (Erdman & Ng, 2015). For example, counter to findings from Western samples (Del Giudice, 2011), Li et al (2019) found that women reported higher levels of both avoidance and anxiety than men among Chinese people. Although such differences are not the same in all cultures, culture may be an indicator of the degree of differentiation (Schmitt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Culturecontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, the influence of culture should also be considered in the study of attachment and interpersonal relationships (Erdman & Ng, 2015). For example, counter to findings from Western samples (Del Giudice, 2011), Li et al (2019) found that women reported higher levels of both avoidance and anxiety than men among Chinese people. Although such differences are not the same in all cultures, culture may be an indicator of the degree of differentiation (Schmitt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Culturecontrasting
confidence: 63%