2019
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1622778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in frequencies of dermatoglyphic patterns by individual fingers

Abstract: Unzurrunzaga FM. 1976. Estudio de las líneas dermopapilares dactilares en mujeres vascas. Análisis de las diferencias sexuales y comparación de los vascos con poblaciones españolas y no españolas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that in our study, a higher number of dimorphic radioulnar contrasts and, at the same time, higher values of their effects of sex differences were observed on the right hand. This result is consistent with a number of other findings on the limbs, both in anthropometric features, for example, skeleton (Králík, Urbanová, et al, 2014), in hand morphometry, for example, hand size, as well as in dermatoglyphic features, for example, frequency of whorls on the fingers of the hand (Králík, Polcerová, et al, 2019). Similarly, a higher sex difference was also observed in the right hand 2D:4D ratio (Hönekopp & Watson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that in our study, a higher number of dimorphic radioulnar contrasts and, at the same time, higher values of their effects of sex differences were observed on the right hand. This result is consistent with a number of other findings on the limbs, both in anthropometric features, for example, skeleton (Králík, Urbanová, et al, 2014), in hand morphometry, for example, hand size, as well as in dermatoglyphic features, for example, frequency of whorls on the fingers of the hand (Králík, Polcerová, et al, 2019). Similarly, a higher sex difference was also observed in the right hand 2D:4D ratio (Hönekopp & Watson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, given the possible reaction of hormonal milieu-including sex hormonesto external/environmental factors population diversity in sex differences of other dermatoglyphic features could be substantial modifiers. For instance, the above mentioned sex differences in frequencies of whorl patterns increased significantly from radial to ulnar fingers and this increase changed with geographical latitude (Kr alík, Polcerov a, et al, 2019). Therefore, it is important to specify the role of external factors in dermatoglyphic variations if dermatoglyphic features are to be used as prenatal developmental markers in prenatal sex development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the sample was analyzed considering both genders, the higher the BMI child the greater the number of ridges in MESQL1 (left thumb) and MDSQL1 (right thumb). However, considering that men and women have different dermatoglyphic patterns [ 30 , 31 ], when the sample was analyzed according to the gender only the male individuals showed a significant difference in the MDSQL1 finger (right thumb), i.e., the greater the number of ridges, the greater the BMI. There was a relationship between BMI and MDT1 fingerprint pattern in male individuals, with a higher frequency of the ulnar loop (UL) pattern in the obese group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis of radioulnar contrasts in dermatoglyphic ridge-counts between individual fingers Dermatoglyphics can draw from experience and the results of more than a hundred years of studies. Meta-analytic aggregations and comparisons of a large number of studies allow both to distinguish erroneous results from the biologically plausible major trends and to generate higher-level views of a multi-population nature, to study e.g., geographic gradients (e.g., Králík et al 2019), dependence on climatic factors (e.g., Bhasin 2007;Rosa 1985), that are not possible in single population studies and limited samples. However, the use of published data in meta-analysis depends on the numerical nature of the secondary data that are published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%