2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itcosp.2017.8303088
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors extracted texture features using grey level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) to classify DR. Harini, and Sheela [11] applied Fuzzy C-Means clustering and some image processing operations (morphological) to extract features from exudates, blood vessels, and microaneurysms which are used as inputs for Support Vector Machines. Punithavathi and Kumar [12] detected the area of microaneurysms through image transformation, top hat transformation, and Otsu's thresholding. The authors also calculated statistical texture properties like mean and entropy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors extracted texture features using grey level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) to classify DR. Harini, and Sheela [11] applied Fuzzy C-Means clustering and some image processing operations (morphological) to extract features from exudates, blood vessels, and microaneurysms which are used as inputs for Support Vector Machines. Punithavathi and Kumar [12] detected the area of microaneurysms through image transformation, top hat transformation, and Otsu's thresholding. The authors also calculated statistical texture properties like mean and entropy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Punithavathi and Kumar ( 25 ) used four different feature extraction techniques (i.e., mean, standard deviation, entropy, and third momentum) and the ELM classifier in order to detect DR. The proposed DR detection system was tested based on a multi-class classification problem using the DIARETDB0 dataset with four different classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although (23)(24)(25)(26) showed that the ELM and KELM outperformed their comparatives, these studies have ignored the fact that the random generated input weights and biases of the ELM and KELM need to be optimized. In other words, there is no guarantee that the trained ELM/KELM is the best for carrying out the classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification is made by taking into consideration the lesion locations or some statistical measures. Similarly, Punithavathi and Kumar [14] used morphological operations to extract the number of microaneurysms and texture features. These features are then classified by the Extreme Learning Machine classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%