2000
DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.5.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?

Abstract: Study objective-Despite excellent mortality indicators, there is clear evidence that the health status of the population of Geneva could be improved if more attention and resources were devoted to prevention strategies. To identify a set of robust health priorities an original approach was used triangulating results between three methods. Methods-The study calculated potential years of life lost, disability adjusted years of life lost, and conducted a Delphi survey to gather the opinion of health professionals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the number of health staff by qualification was obtained from available MoH records, through key informant interviews done by our field teams and by visiting the remaining health facilities. This approach holds promise for minimising potential sources of errors, which in turn enhances the validity of the findings (MacNeil & Hogle, 1998;Schopper et al , 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the number of health staff by qualification was obtained from available MoH records, through key informant interviews done by our field teams and by visiting the remaining health facilities. This approach holds promise for minimising potential sources of errors, which in turn enhances the validity of the findings (MacNeil & Hogle, 1998;Schopper et al , 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasta la fecha más de 30 países han realizado estudios nacionales en gran medida estandarizados sobre la carga de enfermedades. [6][7][8][9][10][11] La OMS realizó estudios globales de carga de enfermedades en ocho regiones del mundo con referencia al año 1990, 12 (GBD90) y al año 2000, 13 (GBD2000). Resultados anuales del cálculo de este indicador por regiones se publican sistemáticamente en el World Health Report.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Because funds are limited, public health programs need to be prioritized [10,11]. Hence, we used the priority health index (PHI), a prioritization methodology applied in the State of Missouri in the United States since 2000 [12,13] and Italy [14] to prioritize public health programs for NCD in the combined 26 state capital cities and the city of Brasilia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%