“…Subjects with MK levels between 650 and 1000 pg·mL −1 would be considered for active surveillance, with re-testing in 3-6 months to determine if MK levels were increasing. Fiegel et al, 2008;Ikematsu et al, 2008;Lucas et al, 2009 Glioblastoma ✓ ✓ Mishima et al, 1997;Stylianou et al, 2009 Meninginoma ✓ ✓ Tong et al, 2007 Neurofibromatosis type 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Mashour et al, 1999; Gastric ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Rha et al, 1997;Ikematsu et al, 2003;Obata et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2012 GI stromal ✓ ✓ Kaifi et al, 2007;Rawnaq et al, 2011 Bladder Brien et al, 1996;Ikematsu et al, 2003;Fiala et al, 2006;Konety, 2006 (Jia et al, 2007;Zhu et al, 2013), and the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma markers CEA and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) (Shimada et al, 2003). However, despite the apparent superiority of MK over these established circulating biomarkers, it is extremely difficult to displace these markers in standard clinical practice.…”