2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus in wild and domestic animals in northern Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infected animals with no apparent disease play a role in the maintenance and spread of TBEV either as the tick harbor or diseased dead-end hosts [ 43 ]. Some seroprevalence studies in horses conducted since 2000 showed TBE seropositivity of up to 26.1% in Austria, 0.8–23.4% in Germany [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], 3.45% in Slovakia [ 46 ], and 3.1% in Spain [ 47 ]. A very high seroprevalence rate of 37.5% and 3.9% TBEV viremic horses were detected in Lithuania [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infected animals with no apparent disease play a role in the maintenance and spread of TBEV either as the tick harbor or diseased dead-end hosts [ 43 ]. Some seroprevalence studies in horses conducted since 2000 showed TBE seropositivity of up to 26.1% in Austria, 0.8–23.4% in Germany [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], 3.45% in Slovakia [ 46 ], and 3.1% in Spain [ 47 ]. A very high seroprevalence rate of 37.5% and 3.9% TBEV viremic horses were detected in Lithuania [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we evaluated the impact of the serological screening method to estimate the seroprevalence for each cell. Generally, ELISA are used as a first screening method and then positive and doubtful results are tested in MNT [19,30,41,52]. Therefore, we considered the following strategies, using positive MNT results for sera directly tested in MNT (scenario MNT), sera tested with cELISA and positive and doubtful sera tested in MNT using cELISA threshold recommended by the manufacturer (scenario A), or using our adjusted threshold weighting sensitivity and the specificity equally (scenario B); (ii) using positive cELISA results with our adjusted threshold for sera directly tested with cELISA (scenario C).…”
Section: Celisa Performance Compared With Mntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we evaluated the impact of the serological screening method to estimate the seroprevalence for each cell. Generally, ELISA are used as a rst screening method and then positive and doubtful results are tested in MNT (19,30,41,50). Therefore, we considered the following strategies, using positive MNT results for sera directly tested in MNT (scenario MNT), sera tested with cELISA and positive and doubtful sera tested in MNT using cELISA threshold recommended by the manufacturer (scenario A), or using our adjusted threshold weighting sensitivity and the speci city equally (scenario B); (ii) using positive cELISA results with our adjusted threshold for sera directly tested with cELISA (scenario C).…”
Section: Celisa Performance Compared With Mntmentioning
confidence: 99%