2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological survey of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninium in goat population in Canary Islands (Macaronesia Archipelago, Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, studies conducted on livestock in the same island revealed a notable decrease in toxoplasmosis seroprevalence over time. Specifically, the prevalence declined from 68% in 1995 to 9.8% in 2017, showing an overall prevalence of 7.8% for goats, the predominant livestock species in the Canary Islands [49]. The authors attribute this decline to advancements in animal production practices at the farm level, mirroring a global trend in reducing toxoplasmosis prevalence in livestock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, studies conducted on livestock in the same island revealed a notable decrease in toxoplasmosis seroprevalence over time. Specifically, the prevalence declined from 68% in 1995 to 9.8% in 2017, showing an overall prevalence of 7.8% for goats, the predominant livestock species in the Canary Islands [49]. The authors attribute this decline to advancements in animal production practices at the farm level, mirroring a global trend in reducing toxoplasmosis prevalence in livestock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The worldwide prevalence of T. gondii among small ruminants varies widely across countries, in both sheep (minimum of 3% in China to a maximum of 94.8% in the USA) and goats (minimum of 7.8% in Spain to a maximum of 90% in Egypt) [26][27][28][29]. We hypothesized that many factors could be associated with this variation, such as geographical and climatic factors, sample size, age of animals, density of infected cats shedding oocysts, type of production or management system, access to contaminated feed and water, techniques used to diagnose infection, as well as the sensitivity-specificity of the testing kits used and their cut-off points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%