2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.577431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial Interval and Generation Interval for Imported and Local Infectors, Respectively, Estimated Using Reported Contact-Tracing Data of COVID-19 in China

Abstract: The emerging virus, COVID-19, has caused a massive outbreak worldwide. Based on the publicly available contact-tracing data, we identified 509 transmission chains from 20 provinces in China and estimated the serial interval (SI) and generation interval (GI) of COVID-19 in China. Inspired by different possible values of the time-varying reproduction number for the imported cases and the local cases in China, we divided all transmission events into three subsets: imported (the zeroth generation) infecting 1st-ge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the latter SI, we report a mean of 4.8 days, median of 4.0 days, IQR between 3.0 and 7.0 days, 95% centile from 1.0 to 9.5 days, 95% percentile of 9.0 days, and a range from 1.0 to 10.0 days. We observe that the mean (and median) SI decreases when generation increases, and this finding was reported previously in ( Li et al, 2020a , Ma et al, 2020 ). With the sample means, we calculate the ratio of latter SI over former SI at (4.8 / 5.4 =) 0.89, which is roughly the same scale as 0.73 in ( Ma et al, 2020 ) and 0.94 or 0.75 in ( Li et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the latter SI, we report a mean of 4.8 days, median of 4.0 days, IQR between 3.0 and 7.0 days, 95% centile from 1.0 to 9.5 days, 95% percentile of 9.0 days, and a range from 1.0 to 10.0 days. We observe that the mean (and median) SI decreases when generation increases, and this finding was reported previously in ( Li et al, 2020a , Ma et al, 2020 ). With the sample means, we calculate the ratio of latter SI over former SI at (4.8 / 5.4 =) 0.89, which is roughly the same scale as 0.73 in ( Ma et al, 2020 ) and 0.94 or 0.75 in ( Li et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We observe that the mean (and median) SI decreases when generation increases, and this finding was reported previously in ( Li et al, 2020a , Ma et al, 2020 ). With the sample means, we calculate the ratio of latter SI over former SI at (4.8 / 5.4 =) 0.89, which is roughly the same scale as 0.73 in ( Ma et al, 2020 ) and 0.94 or 0.75 in ( Li et al, 2020a ). Empirically, the pairwise difference of latter SI minus former SI has a mean of −0.7 days, median of 0.0 day, and IQR between −3.0 and 2.0 days.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The means of the jointly estimated generation interval and incubation period are in line with those reported elsewhere 68,10 with the mean generation interval reported here—4.3 days—falling in the range of 2.8–7.5 days previously reported (see Supplementary Table 1 and Extended Data Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2). Because there is no consensus in the literature as to the precise serial interval for each variant, we used an uncertain serial interval with mean of 5.2 days and standard deviation of 4 days [31][32][33] . Through the uncertain serial interval, multiple distributions were explored where the mean was allowed to vary from 2.2 to 8.2 days, and the standard deviation varied from 2.5 to 5.5 days.…”
Section: Effective Reproduction Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%