2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00336-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel node involvement with or without completion axillary lymph node dissection: treatment and pathologic results of randomized SERC trial

Abstract: Based on results of clinical trials, completion ALND (cALND) is frequently not performed for patients with breast conservation therapy and one or two involved sentinel nodes (SN) by micro- or macro-metastases. However, there were limitations despite a conclusion of non-inferiority for cALND omission. No trial had included patients with SN macro-metastases and total mastectomy or with >2 SN macro-metastases. The aim of the study was too analyze treatment delivered and pathologic results of patients included … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 8% of the patients received PMRT in the SLNB arm compared to 27% in the ALND arm, which calls for an updating of the long-term outcomes in this population [ 19 ]. Three other prospective, randomized trials, whose results are pending, will soon shed light on this topic [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. The SENOMAC trial, recently presented in an abstract form with some pre-specified secondary outcomes, investigated ALND omission in cT1-3N0 patients (whatever the surgery type) with up to two macrometastases after SLNB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 8% of the patients received PMRT in the SLNB arm compared to 27% in the ALND arm, which calls for an updating of the long-term outcomes in this population [ 19 ]. Three other prospective, randomized trials, whose results are pending, will soon shed light on this topic [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. The SENOMAC trial, recently presented in an abstract form with some pre-specified secondary outcomes, investigated ALND omission in cT1-3N0 patients (whatever the surgery type) with up to two macrometastases after SLNB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several nomograms were available to predict non-sentinel nodal involvement, which offers an approach other than completion ALND to guide subsequent treatment [6,23]. Ongoing trials may also address the controversy about the eligibility of omitting or selected ALND in different situations [38][39][40]. For example, SERC study, a multicenter randomized phase-3 trial, included Z0011 non-eligible patients, of whom 43 patients had more than two involved sentinel nodes in the newest publication (20 in ALND arm vs 23 in only SLNB arm) [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing trials may also address the controversy about the eligibility of omitting or selected ALND in different situations [38][39][40]. For example, SERC study, a multicenter randomized phase-3 trial, included Z0011 non-eligible patients, of whom 43 patients had more than two involved sentinel nodes in the newest publication (20 in ALND arm vs 23 in only SLNB arm) [39]. These ongoing prospective randomized trials would unveil the importance of ALND for the Z0011 non-eligible patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with three or more positive lymph nodes could be directly selected for ALND or receive a new adjuvant therapy without SLNB if a reliable method existed to predict ALN burden preoperatively [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%