2008
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.5.685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel Node Biopsy: Facts to Clear the Alleged Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature is rich with pro and con arguments regarding the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymph node chain removal. The responses to the article of Morton et al (A'Hern, 2007;Grichnik, 2007;Kanzler et al, 2007;Lipsker, 2007;Retsas, 2007;Thomas, 2007), a commentary by Gonzales (Gonzalez, 2007) and responses to that commentary (Cochran and Thompson, 2008;Morton and Elashoff, 2008) serve as a window into this active debate. It is possible that a different study design or prolonged follow up will eventually reveal a survival advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is rich with pro and con arguments regarding the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymph node chain removal. The responses to the article of Morton et al (A'Hern, 2007;Grichnik, 2007;Kanzler et al, 2007;Lipsker, 2007;Retsas, 2007;Thomas, 2007), a commentary by Gonzales (Gonzalez, 2007) and responses to that commentary (Cochran and Thompson, 2008;Morton and Elashoff, 2008) serve as a window into this active debate. It is possible that a different study design or prolonged follow up will eventually reveal a survival advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%