2015 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/csci.2015.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques with Syntax Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pang et al (2002) used Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM) and Maximum Entropy Learning Classifier to classify the emotions of movie reviews, and finally proved that SVM has the best classification effect. Zou et al (2015) considered the complex syntactic relationship in the text, combine the position of words, the dependence/grammar relationship between words and the part-of-speech characteristics, and effectively improved the performance of emotional classification to 86 per cent. Rao et al (2016) used potential topics, emotional tags and readers’ emotional scores to generate topic features and proposed a topical classification method based on topic-level maximum entropy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pang et al (2002) used Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM) and Maximum Entropy Learning Classifier to classify the emotions of movie reviews, and finally proved that SVM has the best classification effect. Zou et al (2015) considered the complex syntactic relationship in the text, combine the position of words, the dependence/grammar relationship between words and the part-of-speech characteristics, and effectively improved the performance of emotional classification to 86 per cent. Rao et al (2016) used potential topics, emotional tags and readers’ emotional scores to generate topic features and proposed a topical classification method based on topic-level maximum entropy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the performance of Naive Bayes (NB), Maximum Entropy (ME) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) combined with different features on emotion classification, they find that the accuracy of SVM combined with UNIGRAMS features could reach 82.9% [9]. ZOU and TANG et al take into account the complex syntactic relationships in the text, which combine word positions, dependence or grammatical relations between words and part-of speech characteristics, effectively improving the emotional classification performance [10]. Although machine learning method achieves good results, it requires a large number of manual annotation data sets to train the model, and the high-quality data sets cost a lot of time and labor.…”
Section: ) Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used NB, Maximum Entropy, and SVM classifiers to achieve a two-class classification. Tripathy et al [6] and Zou et al [7] furthered the work of Pang et al [5] by adding TF-IDF, POS tagging, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in order to improve the accuracies. Ukhti Ikhsani Larasati et al [8] developed the work of Tripathy et al [6] and used the chi-squared method of feature selection along with the already proposed SVM classifier.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%