1969
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1969.00770030583010
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Sensorineural Hearing Loss Associated With Firearms

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
28
5
3
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
33

Relationship

0
33

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 33 publications

(19 citation statements)
references

References 4 publications

4
15
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This difference in sound pressure levels is thought to be due to the 'head shadow effect' whereby the left ear is in direct line with the muzzle of the weapon and the right ear is shielded by the head. This finding is in agreement with other published research (Keim [19]; Moon et al [20]; Razaee et al [21]; Job et al [22]). The peak sound pressure levels shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sound Levels At the Left And Right Ear
supporting
confidence: 94%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This difference in sound pressure levels is thought to be due to the 'head shadow effect' whereby the left ear is in direct line with the muzzle of the weapon and the right ear is shielded by the head. This finding is in agreement with other published research (Keim [19]; Moon et al [20]; Razaee et al [21]; Job et al [22]). The peak sound pressure levels shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sound Levels At the Left And Right Ear
supporting
confidence: 94%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Means and standard deviations (SDs) of the HTLs for each database are given in Table 1 of Moore et al (2022b) . On average the individuals in MilDB1 and MilDB2 had greater hearing loss at high frequencies for the left ears than for the right ears, as has been reported previously for M-NIHL ( Keim, 1969 ; Moore, 2020 ; Lowe & Moore, 2021 ). This is probably mainly due to greater noise exposure of the left ear, produced, for example, by the way that a rifle is usually fired from the right shoulder, which results in partial shielding of the right ear via the head-shadow effect ( Keim, 1969 ).…”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…On average the individuals in MilDB1 and MilDB2 had greater hearing loss at high frequencies for the left ears than for the right ears, as has been reported previously for M-NIHL ( Keim, 1969 ; Moore, 2020 ; Lowe & Moore, 2021 ). This is probably mainly due to greater noise exposure of the left ear, produced, for example, by the way that a rifle is usually fired from the right shoulder, which results in partial shielding of the right ear via the head-shadow effect ( Keim, 1969 ). Engdahl and Aarhus (2023) assessed ear asymmetry for two large cohorts of people who used recreational firearms and found that ear asymmetry was smaller for the recent cohort, consistent with the idea that the asymmetry is related to greater exposure of the left ear, on average, rather than to inherent differences of the left and right ears in susceptibility to NIHL.…”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 83%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Means and standard deviations (SDs) of the HTLs of each group are given in Table 2 . Note that on average both databases of military noise-exposed individuals had greater hearing loss at high frequencies for the left than for the right ears, as has been reported previously ( Keim, 1969 ; Lowe & Moore, 2021 ; Moore, 2020 ). This has been attributed to greater noise exposure of the left ear, on average, for example, because of the way that a rifle is usually fired from the right shoulder, which usually results in partial shielding of the right ear via the head-shadow effect ( Keim, 1969 ).…”
Section: Modifications To the M-nihl Methods
supporting
confidence: 80%