1933
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1933.01450040317013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitization and Desensitization in Man With Snake Venom (Ancistrodon Piscivorus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1935
1935
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anaphylaxis and immediate-type respiratory reactions to snake venom have been reported previously (Parrish, Watt & Arnold, 1957;Ellis & Smith, 1965;Mendes, 1960;Stanic, 1956;Parrish, 1957). Skin testing with snake venom to demonstrate specific reaginic antibody has been complicated by local haemorrhagic (Peck, 1933;Golan & Hill, 1940) and non-specific weal and erythema responses Parrish, 1957;Peck, 1933;Golan & Hill, 1940) in both normals and venom sensitive individuals, presumably caused by the enzymatic and toxic activity of these agents. The following is a case report of an IgE mediated response to snake venom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaphylaxis and immediate-type respiratory reactions to snake venom have been reported previously (Parrish, Watt & Arnold, 1957;Ellis & Smith, 1965;Mendes, 1960;Stanic, 1956;Parrish, 1957). Skin testing with snake venom to demonstrate specific reaginic antibody has been complicated by local haemorrhagic (Peck, 1933;Golan & Hill, 1940) and non-specific weal and erythema responses Parrish, 1957;Peck, 1933;Golan & Hill, 1940) in both normals and venom sensitive individuals, presumably caused by the enzymatic and toxic activity of these agents. The following is a case report of an IgE mediated response to snake venom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%