Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model

Abstract

The most recent version of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology atmospheric general circulation model, ECHAM5, is used to study the impact of changes in horizontal and vertical resolution on seasonal mean climate. In a series of Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)-style experiments with resolutions ranging between T21L19 and T159L31, the systematic errors and convergence properties are assessed for two vertical resolutions. At low vertical resolution (L19) there is no evidence for convergence to a more realistic climate state for horizontal resolutions higher than T42. At higher vertical resolution (L31), on the other hand, the root-mean-square errors decrease monotonically with increasing horizontal resolution. Furthermore, except for T42, the L31 versions are superior to their L19 counterparts, and the improvements become more evident at increasingly higher horizontal resolutions. This applies, in particular, to the zonal mean climate state and to the stationary wave patterns in boreal winter. As in previous studies, increasing horizontal resolution leads to a warming of the troposphere, most prominently at midlatitudes, and to a poleward shift and intensification of the midlatitude westerlies. Increasing the vertical resolution has the opposite effect, almost independent of horizontal resolution. Whereas the atmosphere is colder at low and middle latitudes, it is warmer at high latitudes and close to the surface. In addition, increased vertical resolution results in a pronounced warming in the polar upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, where the cold bias is reduced by up to 50% compared to L19 simulations. Consistent with these temperature changes is a decrease and equatorward shift of the midlatitude westerlies. The substantial benefits in refining both horizontal and vertical resolution give some support to scaling arguments deduced from quasigeostrophic theory implying that horizontal and vertical resolution ought to be chosen consistently.

Extremes of Temperature, Oxygen and Blooms in the Baltic Sea in a Changing Climate

“…The IPCC scenario was realized by the global circulation models ECHAM5 (Roeckner et al 2006) and HadCM3 (Gordon et al 2000). From the ECHAM5 simulation, three realizations were used.…”

Tropical tropospheric ozone column retrieval for GOME-2

“…It uses the second version of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2) to link multi-institutional computer codes. The core atmospheric model is the fifth generation European Centre Hamburg general circulation model (ECHAM5, Roeckner et al, 2006). For the present study we applied EMAC (ECHAM5 version 5.3.02, MESSy version 2.41) in the T42L90MA-resolution, i.e.…”

Impact of Climate Change on Ecological Quality Indicators and Biogeochemical Fluxes in the Baltic Sea: A Multi-Model Ensemble Study

“…In this study, lateral boundary data from two GCMs are used: HadCM3 from the Hadley Centre in the UK (Gordon et al 2000) and ECHAM5/MPI-OM from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany (Jungclaus et al 2006;Roeckner et al 2006), henceforth short ECHAM5. HadCM3 is forced with the A1B greenhouse gas emission scenario (Nakićenović et al 2000), whereas ECHAM5 is driven both with A1B and A2.…”