2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of neurovascular ultrasound for the detection of spontaneous cervical artery dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…100 Others have found abnormalities on ultrasonogram in 29 of 31 VADs 31 and 24 of 26 VADs. 186 VADs that were normal on ultrasonogram were nonocclusive. 31 In ICADs presenting only with a Horner syndrome, ultrasonogram was abnormal in only 69%.…”
Section: Duplex Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…100 Others have found abnormalities on ultrasonogram in 29 of 31 VADs 31 and 24 of 26 VADs. 186 VADs that were normal on ultrasonogram were nonocclusive. 31 In ICADs presenting only with a Horner syndrome, ultrasonogram was abnormal in only 69%.…”
Section: Duplex Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some advocate the use of Doppler ultrasound;15 however, it has limited utility given the course of the vertebral artery in the neck and limited evaluation of the vertebral arteries cephalad to the origin. Additionally, ultrasound imaging is unlikely to allow visualisation of the dissection itself and thus can be negative in the absence of significant arterial occlusion 16 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El doppler de vasos de cuello se puede utilizar inicialmente como tamizaje ante la sospecha de esta entidad o para hacer seguimiento posterior al inicio del tratamiento, teniendo en cuenta que es operador dependiente y detecta anormalidades en el 68 al 95 % de los casos (14,15). Para el manejo se ha utilizado la terapia antitrombótica, ya sea con anticoagulación o antiagregación; hasta el momento no se han encontrado diferencias entre el tratamiento con estas dos terapias, siendo aún igual de efectivas para la prevención del accidente cerebrovascular recurrente (16).…”
Section: El Estudio Cadisp (Siglas En Inglés De Cervical Artery Disseunclassified