2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensemaking of managing cultural differences in a Finnish-Polish project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is a limitation to the transferability of the results of this study beyond the cultural setting of the region in which the case company is embedded. Our case company is headquartered in both Finland and Sweden where power distance and organizational hierarchy are typically low, and employees possess high levels of independence and autonomy (Boye and Grönlund, 2018;Tukiainen, 2015). Perhaps due to their cultural background, talented employees studied were well equipped to participate in key projects and create key positions as part of their project work in the first place.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is a limitation to the transferability of the results of this study beyond the cultural setting of the region in which the case company is embedded. Our case company is headquartered in both Finland and Sweden where power distance and organizational hierarchy are typically low, and employees possess high levels of independence and autonomy (Boye and Grönlund, 2018;Tukiainen, 2015). Perhaps due to their cultural background, talented employees studied were well equipped to participate in key projects and create key positions as part of their project work in the first place.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The national cultures of individuals were to justify decisions and give the group a raison d'être. Tukiainen (2015) also applies discourse analysis to investigate a Finnish-Polish cooperation, revealing that alleged cultural differences reflect power struggles between the two parties.…”
Section: Studies At the Interpersonal And Individual Level Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second major contribution of these paradigms is the demonstration of the role of power at play in connection to culture, either in the narrative construction of national culture differences or individual identities (Ybema and Buyn 2009;Tukiainen 2015;Moore 2016) or in the use of cross-cultural training (see Cheng 2010). Referring to culture can hide social, political, or other forms of inequalities that the individuals who are interacting are experiencing (Primecz, Mahadevan, and Romani 2016).…”
Section: Contributions From the Postmodern And Critical Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies inspired by radical humanist thoughts in CCM tend to challenge the concept of national culture, which they view as a grand narrative (Vaara 2002;Tienari et al 2005) and a construction that promotes a stable and rather homogeneous understanding of culture(s) (McSweeney 2002(McSweeney , 2009. When linked to postmodern thought, they reveal hybrid, changing, and mixed cultural identities, depending upon the contexts (see Barinaga 2007;Magala 2009;Tukiainen 2015), influenced by power-effects (Mahadevan 2017). They also put cultural diversity, fluidity, and dynamism at the center of the investigation.…”
Section: The Radical Humanist Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%