2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00734.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensation and distribution of stress and deformation in the human oesophagus

Abstract: Evaluation of the distribution of stresses and strains in relation to distension-induced sensation in the human oesophagus is valuable for understanding oesophageal biomechanics and mechano-sensation. In 12 healthy volunteers a specially designed oesophageal bag containing an endoscopic ultrasound probe was inflated to the moderate pain level. Ultrasound images, bag pressure and perceived sensation were recorded before and after pharmacological relaxation of the smooth muscle with butylscopolamine. The oesopha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(43 reference statements)
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not a surprise because motion artifacts from active phasic muscular activity in the esophagus were much less prominent during BSB. The fact that the pain response was not different with or without BSB indicates that pain was dependent on the increasing passive stretch of the wall, whereas the active phasic contractions elicited by bag distension did not contribute to pain, as previously found by Takeda et al [14] and Frøkjaer et al [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This was not a surprise because motion artifacts from active phasic muscular activity in the esophagus were much less prominent during BSB. The fact that the pain response was not different with or without BSB indicates that pain was dependent on the increasing passive stretch of the wall, whereas the active phasic contractions elicited by bag distension did not contribute to pain, as previously found by Takeda et al [14] and Frøkjaer et al [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, the peptide hydrogels that mOECs responded well to (PGD-AlphaProC and PGD-CGD2) also possess similar mechanical properties to the native human oesophagus tissue interface (5-50 KPa). [37] In fact, after media conditioning, the majority of the hydrogels on the panel had G′ values above 5 kPa, except PGD-AlphaProB and PGD-C2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies done with esophageal muscle from animals have shown that, when axial slices of passive esophageal muscle are cut along its circumference, it tends to open (16,29,33). The "opening angle" is a qualitative measure of "residual tension," the level of circularly oriented passive tension that would be required to reclose the gut segment and return muscle to its precut state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We apply this mathematical formalism to model the stress-strain properties of the muscularis propria. All muscle mechanics studies done in the human esophagus, except for two notable exceptions (16,38), have assumed the esophageal wall to be "thin". 1 This incorrect assumption, although leading to great simplification of the mathematics, has important implications to the accuracy of predictions, so we do not make it.…”
Section: The Physio-mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%