2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seminal cell-free DNA molecular profile as a novel diagnostic and prognostic prostate cancer biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current authors recently demonstrated, for the first time, that human seminal fluid can be a valuable source of cfDNA for the identification of novel oncological biomarkers and seminal plasma cfDNA from PCa patients is significantly more concentrated than agematched healthy individuals and patients affected by BPH. (Ponti et al, 2018e) In the near future, the quantification and analysis of cfDNA will probably become part of routine diagnostic and clinical management of cancer patients. In order to accomplish this goal, it will be important to standardize ctDNA quantification methods and allow ctDNA detection for rare molecular alterations in order to anticipate drug resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current authors recently demonstrated, for the first time, that human seminal fluid can be a valuable source of cfDNA for the identification of novel oncological biomarkers and seminal plasma cfDNA from PCa patients is significantly more concentrated than agematched healthy individuals and patients affected by BPH. (Ponti et al, 2018e) In the near future, the quantification and analysis of cfDNA will probably become part of routine diagnostic and clinical management of cancer patients. In order to accomplish this goal, it will be important to standardize ctDNA quantification methods and allow ctDNA detection for rare molecular alterations in order to anticipate drug resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fluorimetric technique allows a fast and convenient quantification of the total amount of cfDNA, without distinction between the non-neoplastic and neoplastic fraction. It is plausible that the measurement of the total amount of cfDNA could be a more sensitive biomarker of the neoplastic process because the total amount of cfDNA includes also the fraction derived from apoptosis and necrosis (10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this antigen is not cancer-specific and may be elevated in other non-malignant conditions, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis (6,7). Several new biological markers such as BRCA2 (8,9), TMPRSS2-Erg fusion and PCA3 (10) and four-kallikrein panel (11) have been shown to add sensitivity and specificity to PSA, thereby decreasing the incidence of PCa over-diagnosis. Current evidence regarding biomarkers is too limited for the development of recommendations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences in levels and size distribution of cfDNA were also found in seminal fluid of PCa and BPH patients, respectively [3][4][5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The extraction and characterization of ctDNA from seminal fluid (scfDNA) is probably a major step forward in PCa diagnosis and follow-up compared to traditional diagnostic techniques involving prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and invasive biopsy [12]. Recently, we reported that the quantification and the electrophoretic characterization of cfDNA in seminal plasma can differentiate between PCa patients, BPH patients, and age-matched healthy individuals; indeed, scfDNA concentrations are higher in PCa patients and present a distinct electrophoretic pattern [3,4]. scfDNA can be easily analysed through cost-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%