2017
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Sembragiline in Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial (MAyflOwer RoAD)
Abstract: Background: Sembragiline is a potent, selective, long-acting, and reversible MAO-B inhibitor developed as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sembragiline in patients with moderate AD.Methods: In this Phase II study (NCT01677754), 542 patients with moderate dementia (MMSE 13–20) on background acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with/without memantine were randomized (1:1:1) to sembragiline 1 mg, 5 mg, or placebo once daily orally for 5… Show more
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
39
7
5
1
Citation Types
2
38
0
0
Year Published
Range
2016
20162026
2026Publication Types
Select...
43
3
2
1
Relationship
2
47
Authors
Journals
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
References 34 publications
2
38
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagiline‐treated participants who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events compared to the placebo group suggests an additional effect worthy of further study. This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO‐B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline 12 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO-B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline. 12 Our findings indicate that differences associated with rasagiline treatment may be most detectable in participants exceeding baseline thresholds of temporal tau burden, hypometabolism, and atrophy (Fig-…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagiline‐treated participants who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events compared to the placebo group suggests an additional effect worthy of further study. This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO‐B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline 12 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO-B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline. 12 Our findings indicate that differences associated with rasagiline treatment may be most detectable in participants exceeding baseline thresholds of temporal tau burden, hypometabolism, and atrophy (Fig-…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagilinetreated participants (0) who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events (agitation, psychosis) compared to the placebo group (5) suggests an additional treatment effect that is worthy of further study. This observation supports the ndings of a potential effect of MAO-B inhibition on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a Phase 2 trial of sembragiline, an MAO-B inhibitor 13 .…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ). The authors reported that, in their study, they did not observe any treatment effect because the study subjects were already receiving treatment during the study period and that the clinical efficacy of sembragiline may be noted in a monotherapy clinical trial ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagiline‐treated participants who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events compared to the placebo group suggests an additional effect worthy of further study. This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO‐B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline 12 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO-B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline. 12 Our findings indicate that differences associated with rasagiline treatment may be most detectable in participants exceeding baseline thresholds of temporal tau burden, hypometabolism, and atrophy (Fig-…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagilinetreated participants (0) who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events (agitation, psychosis) compared to the placebo group (5) suggests an additional treatment effect that is worthy of further study. This observation supports the ndings of a potential effect of MAO-B inhibition on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a Phase 2 trial of sembragiline, an MAO-B inhibitor 13 .…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ). The authors reported that, in their study, they did not observe any treatment effect because the study subjects were already receiving treatment during the study period and that the clinical efficacy of sembragiline may be noted in a monotherapy clinical trial ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagiline‐treated participants who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events compared to the placebo group suggests an additional effect worthy of further study. This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO‐B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline 12 …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This observation supports the finding of a potential MAO-B inhibition effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a phase 2 trial of sembragiline. 12 Our findings indicate that differences associated with rasagiline treatment may be most detectable in participants exceeding baseline thresholds of temporal tau burden, hypometabolism, and atrophy (Fig-…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
mentioning
confidence: 68%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lower number of rasagilinetreated participants (0) who spontaneously reported neuropsychiatric events (agitation, psychosis) compared to the placebo group (5) suggests an additional treatment effect that is worthy of further study. This observation supports the ndings of a potential effect of MAO-B inhibition on neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients reported in a Phase 2 trial of sembragiline, an MAO-B inhibitor 13 .…”
Section: Rasagiline Effects
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although the recent failure of the reversible MAO-B inhibitor sembragiline in a clinical trial involving patients with AD is discouraging ( 30 ), our study offers plausible explanations for sembragiline’s failure. In the aforementioned clinical study, sembragiline was administered to patients with moderate to severe AD who had been taking either donepezil (5 to 10 mg daily) or rivastigmine (4.6 mg daily or 9.5 mg daily patch) for at least 6 months ( 30 ). The authors reported that, in their study, they did not observe any treatment effect because the study subjects were already receiving treatment during the study period and that the clinical efficacy of sembragiline may be noted in a monotherapy clinical trial ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 75%