Self-rated literacy level does not explain educational differences in health and disease

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough literacy is increasingly considered to play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in health, its contribution to the explanation of educational differences in health has remained unexplored. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of self-rated literacy to educational differences in health.MethodsData was collected from the Healthy Foundation and Lifestyle Segmentation Dataset (n = 4257). Self-rated literacy was estimated by individuals’ self-reported confidence in reading written English. We used logistic regression analyses to assess the association between educational level and health (long term conditions and self-rated health). Self-rated literacy and other potential explanatory variables were separately added to each model. For each added variable we calculated the percentage change in odds ratio to assess the contribution to the explanation of educational differences in health.ResultsPeople with lower educational attainment level were more likely to report a long term condition (OR 2.04, CI 1.80-2.32). These educational differences could mostly be explained by age (OR decreased by 27%) and could only minimally be explained by self-rated literacy, as measured by self-rated reading skills (OR decreased by 1%). Literacy could not explain differences in cardiovascular condition or diabetes, and only minimally contributed to mental health problems and depression (OR decreased by 5%). The odds of rating ones own health more negatively was higher for people with a low educational level compared to those with a higher educational level (OR 1.83, CI 1.59-2.010), self-rated literacy decreased the OR by 7%.ConclusionMeasuring self-rated reading skills does not contribute significantly to the explanation of educational differences in health and disease. Further research should aim for the development of objective generic and specific instruments to measure health literacy skills in the context of health care, disease prevention and health promotion. Such instruments are not only important in the explanation of educational differences in health and disease, but can also be used to identify a group at risk of poorer health through low basic skills, enabling health services and health information to be targeted at those with greater need.

Low Health Literacy Is Associated With Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes in a Nonclinical Population

“…Our results support findings that specific population subgroups are vulnerable to perpetuating poor health due to low health literacy. 8,9,22,43,[46][47][48][49][50][51] In parallel with other studies utilizing the HLQ as a measurement tool, our findings highlight that those with low health literacy were more likely to earn a lower income, be unemployed, have comorbidities, have lower education, have a mental health condition, or live alone. 43,46 Low health literacy is consistently associated with poorer diabetes knowledge.…”

Health literacy and meeting breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among Asians and whites in California

“…Other types of health literacy may be more relevant for Asian American cancer screening (Baker 2006 ). Furthermore, while previous studies have found self-reported literacy and health literacy to be stronger explanatory factors for some health disparities than race/ethnicity (Sentell and Halpin 2006 ; Bennett et al 2009 ; Howard et al 2006 ), this relationship is not consistent across all outcomes, suggesting that literacy and health literacy may work distinctly in different health areas (Bennett et al 2009 ; Fransen et al 2014 ). Also, the CHIS only included a health literacy measures in the 2007 data.…”

Adult BMI change and risk of Breast Cancer: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010

“…Low socio-economic status in terms of lower income, lower educational attainment and lower literacy levels [36, 37] are associated with poor health outcomes [38]. Likewise, inadequate health literacy is associated with lower knowledge or disease etiology and prevention [39, 40]. Overall, non-Hispanic black women have a lower socio-economic status when compared to non-Hispanic white women.…”