2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.235102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistentGWcalculations for semiconductors and insulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

62
720
4
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 908 publications
(803 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
62
720
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations were performed within the projected augmented wave formalism [41] as implemented in the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (vasp) [42,43]. The Green's functions (G) were first calculated by using the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and eigenstates and then iterated four times, which proved to be sufficient to achieve numerical convergence [44]. The screened Coulomb interaction (W 0 ) is calculated on the basis of the frequencydependent dielectric function, W 0 = ǫ −1 0 v, which, in turn, is computed at the RPA level [40] as ǫ 0 = 1 − vχ 0 , where v is the bare Coulomb interaction and χ 0 is the independent particle polarizability.…”
Section: B Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations were performed within the projected augmented wave formalism [41] as implemented in the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (vasp) [42,43]. The Green's functions (G) were first calculated by using the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and eigenstates and then iterated four times, which proved to be sufficient to achieve numerical convergence [44]. The screened Coulomb interaction (W 0 ) is calculated on the basis of the frequencydependent dielectric function, W 0 = ǫ −1 0 v, which, in turn, is computed at the RPA level [40] as ǫ 0 = 1 − vχ 0 , where v is the bare Coulomb interaction and χ 0 is the independent particle polarizability.…”
Section: B Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSE calculations are performed on top of Green's-function-based GW ionisation potential and electron affinity calculations [63,70,71], which are started from the eigenvalues and wavefunctions from a ground state DFT calculation. While self-consistent GW calculations are possible [72][73][74][75][76], most BSE calculations are performed on top of non self-consistent G 0 W 0 or partially self-consistent GW 0 calculations and hence will show some dependence on the XC functional used in the underlying DFT calculation. GW calculation also requires testing for convergence in terms of the number of empty states to include, and the method and quality of frequency integration.…”
Section: Optical Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kohn-Sham DFT (KS-DFT) approximations predict poorly quasiparticle excitation energies both in confined and in extended systems, [2][3][4] even for the frontier occupied orbital energy, for which KS-DFT is expected to be exact. [5][6][7] This has led to the development of two main first-principles alternative frameworks for quasiparticle excitations: many-body perturbation theory, mainly within the so-called GW approximation 8 on top of DFT, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and generalized-KS DFT. [26][27][28][29][30] Recently, range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals 31-37 combined with an optimally-tuned range parameter 38,39 were shown to very successfully predict quasiparticle band gaps, band edge energies and excitation energies for a range of interesting small molecular systems, well matching both experimental results and GW predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%