1998
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.116.3.324
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Selective Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia Based on Distance/Near Differences

Abstract: Background: Classic teaching suggests that surgery for intermittent exotropia should be based on distance/near differences. Divergence excess, according to tradition, should be treated with symmetric lateral rectus recessions; simulated divergence excess and basic deviations should be treated with a recess/resect procedure. This teaching, to our knowledge, has not been systematically tested. Objectives: To evaluate the appropriateness of selective surgery based on distance/near differences and to determine if … Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
146
52
35
6

Citation Types

6
185
0
10

Year Published

Range
1998
1998
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
189
13
6
5

Relationship

3
210

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 213 publications

(201 citation statements)
references

References 21 publications

6
185
0
10
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The success rate in patients with basic type IXT who had undergone BLR-rec and R&R procedures was 65.8% (25/38) and 85.1% (40/47), respectively, after a mean follow-up of 14.8±9.5 months. The results of this study are in agreement with the Kushner4 and Audery7 studies that R&R is more effective than BLR-rec. Furthermore, the undercorrection rate in patients who had undergone BLR-rec was 23.7% (9/38) in our study, similar to Fiorelli's result of 28.6%6 and Choi's result of 21.8% (1-year follow-up),8 but lower than Audery's result of 56% 7.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%