2018
DOI: 10.29152/koiks.2018.49.1.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Exposure and Political Polarization of Public Opinion on the Presidential Impeachment in South Korea : Facebook vs. KakaoTalk

Abstract: Many previous studies have proven that social media is more likely to promote selective exposure in the acquisition of political information and to escalate political polarization than is older media. However, this study argues that the impact of social media on selective exposure and political polarization occurs differently according to the characteristics of their platforms. To prove this argument, we firstly compared old and social media in terms of their impact on selective exposure. Secondly, we compared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Democrats and Republicans, Beam et al, 2018), and in other cases they were asked to rate specific people (e.g. presidential candidates; Min & Yun, 2018). However, others used measures that diverged from this, including the extent to which people viewed gubernatorial candidates as 'a strong leader' (Johnson & Lee, 2015), and the positive and negative sentiment used in Tweets about political allies and opponents (Yarchi et al, 2020), or one's own positive/negative emotional valence before and after seeing a video of a politician (Cho et al, 2020).…”
Section: Polarization Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Democrats and Republicans, Beam et al, 2018), and in other cases they were asked to rate specific people (e.g. presidential candidates; Min & Yun, 2018). However, others used measures that diverged from this, including the extent to which people viewed gubernatorial candidates as 'a strong leader' (Johnson & Lee, 2015), and the positive and negative sentiment used in Tweets about political allies and opponents (Yarchi et al, 2020), or one's own positive/negative emotional valence before and after seeing a video of a politician (Cho et al, 2020).…”
Section: Polarization Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the strength of partisanship and party ties was found to play a crucial role in the process of polarization (e.g., Min & Yun, 2018). Party ties seemed to be strengthened by the use of social media (Cho et al, 2018), with stronger ties enhancing selective exposure, which led, in turn, to ideological polarization (Johnson, Kaye, & Lee, 2017).…”
Section: Qualitative Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following previous studies that measured selective exposure indirectly via self-reports (e.g., Kaye et al, 2012;Bardin et al, 2018;Min and Yun, 2018), six items were formulated to assess the individuals' propensity to consume congruent or affirmative information (e.g., "I do not like consuming media content that presents viewpoints on a topic that I personally tend to disapprove of, " "When consuming media, I consciously make sure that I also deal with points of view that do not coincide with my own, " inverted item, α = 0.71). Respondents were asked to indicate the degree to which each statement applied to them (0 = "does not apply at all, " 6 = "fully applies").…”
Section: Perceived Informedness Selective Exposure and Mistrust In Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%