“…The remarkable catalytic performance exhibited by SACs can be attributed to tunable active sites and electronic structure. ,− For instance, the maintenance of isolated TM atoms and incorporated nitrogen atoms contribute to the enhancement of activity. − Nevertheless, the strong electronegativity of nitrogen atoms may result in a strong binding strength with intermediates, which is not favorable for the ORR. − In order to adjust the adsorption strength between active site and intermediates, various strategies have been employed, including adjusting coordination atoms ,, and utilizing different kinds of carbon supports. , For instance, g-C 3 N 4 has a variety of active sites with different coordination environments according to different TM loading sites, thus exhibiting excellent catalytic performance. , Similar to g-C 3 N 4 , the experimentally synthesized g-C 4 N 3 monolayer is also a promising graphitic carbon nitride material . g-C 4 N 3 is a half-metal material with suitable vacancies, as well as abundant nitrogen ligands and electron pairs near the vacancy, which indicates that g-C 4 N 3 may have better conductivity, thus becoming a promising electrocatalyst material. , It has shown excellent catalytic ability in nitrogen reduction reaction and HCHO oxidation reaction. , Advanced DFT techniques, such as computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model and constant potential model (CPM) DFT schemes, , are commonly used to describe ORR and other electrochemical reaction pathways.…”