2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of oil spill response method in Arctic offshore waters: A fuzzy decision tree based framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy decision tree algorithm [1] is an improved algorithm of decision tree algorithm [2]. As fuzzy classifification systems based on fuzzy decision tree are generally robust, FDT have been widely and successfully applied to many fields, such as decision-making [3,4], classification and prediction [5,6], medical treatment [7,8,9], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy decision tree algorithm [1] is an improved algorithm of decision tree algorithm [2]. As fuzzy classifification systems based on fuzzy decision tree are generally robust, FDT have been widely and successfully applied to many fields, such as decision-making [3,4], classification and prediction [5,6], medical treatment [7,8,9], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can also apply to physical methods as marine oil spill remediation. [105][106][107] Thermal remediation methods, such as in situ burning, [108][109][110] are a simple and rapid means of remediation that requires minimal specialized equipment to remove a great deal of spilled oil efficiently. The effectiveness of this method depends on the condition of the wind and quality of the oil; it is effective when there is no wind, and the spills consists of fresh oils or light refined products, which quickly burn without endangering marine life.…”
Section: Remediation Technologies For Oil Spillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The richness of video content and video quality determine the retention and experience of members (Farnaz et al) [ 3 ]. However, live video education evolved from the traditional video industry, but it is quite different from the traditional new media business in terms of video content, video architecture, user needs, member audience, and so on (Hu et al) [ 4 ]. Therefore, we cannot apply the traditional video model evaluation methods to the modern video education model, so we lack some evaluation and deep understanding of the current video education model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%