Selecting software components with multiple interfaces

Iribarne, Luís; Troya, José M.; Vallecillo, Antonio

doi:10.1109/eurmic.2002.1046129

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Typically, component specifications are expressed in an Architecture Description Language. Signature matching [25,29,13] uses signatures (or types) as a basis for comparing components. The signature of a component is the set of the signatures of its interfaces, which in turn are sets of operation signatures.…”

Section: Component Matchingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Querying reflexive component-based architectures

Alia¹,

Lenglet²,

Coupaye³

et al. 2004

Proceedings. 30th Euromicro Conference, 2004.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of large-scale distributed componentbased systems, this article motivates the need for and defines a general open query service. This query service allows for retrieving and selecting components from both repositories and deployed running systems. The problem of retrieving components from repositories has already been tackled by many research works whose purpose is to construct systems by assembling reusable components, typically in the context of COTS components. However, the proposed query services allows for an uniform efficient associative access to both repositories and running systems, while beeing based on distributed database techniques, which is the main contribution in this paper.

show abstract

Section: Component Matchingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We consider that operators such as "≤" that compares components for substitutability [13], are higher-order operators that can be expressed using the operators of our language.…”

Section: Query Expressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Querying reflexive component-based architectures

Alia¹,

Lenglet²,

Coupaye³

et al. 2004

Proceedings. 30th Euromicro Conference, 2004.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An algorithm for selecting COTS components with multiple interfaces from a repository in order to implement a given software architecture is presented in [9]. The traditional interface operators are extended to the case in which components supports more than one interface.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automatic configuration for the component selection problem

Veșcan

Pop

2008

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology - CSTST '08

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) is concerned with the assembly of pre-existing software components that leads to a software system that responds to client-specific requirements. Component selection and component systems assembly have become two of the key issues involved in this process.This work presents an approach for component selection, solution based on maximum number of provided operations that satisfy the current requirements.Another contribution of this paper addresses the problem of automatic assembly of component systems. The algorithm CSAC (Component System Automatic Configurations) is presented. With our case study we show that our approach is efficient and generally applicable in practical scenarios.

show abstract

“…The problems of identification and selection the right software components out of a range of choices to satisfy a set of requirements have received considerable attention in the field of component-based software engineering during the last two decades [9,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Third Case Study for the Dynamic Multilevel Component Selection

Veșcan

2017

Studia UBB Informatica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The architecture of a system changes after the deployment phase due to new requirements from the stakeholders. The software architect must make decisions about the selection of the right software components out of a range of choices to satisfy a set of requirements. This paper deals with the component selection problem with a multilevel system view in a dynamic environment.To validate our approach we have used the case study method. Three different case studies were performed but only one is presented in the current paper. The research design was conducted using a research question, propositions and for interpreting the study's findings we have used the Wilcoxon signed ranks statistical test. The tests performed show the potential of evolutionary algorithms for the dynamic multilevel component selection problem.

show abstract

Selecting software components with multiple interfaces

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 19 publications

References 19 publications

Querying reflexive component-based architectures

Querying reflexive component-based architectures

Automatic configuration for the component selection problem

Third Case Study for the Dynamic Multilevel Component Selection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About