2002
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Methodologies for the Evaluation of Differences in Time to Response Between Antidepressants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This survival analytical approach is generally considered to be the most rigorous and sensitive in detecting differences in the speed of response of antidepressants (Montgomery et al, 2002). Indeed, this method has the advantage that the parameter of interest (in this case, the time to early improvement and response) is calculated individually for each patient rather than from group means and can therefore be more reliably determined (Thase, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This survival analytical approach is generally considered to be the most rigorous and sensitive in detecting differences in the speed of response of antidepressants (Montgomery et al, 2002). Indeed, this method has the advantage that the parameter of interest (in this case, the time to early improvement and response) is calculated individually for each patient rather than from group means and can therefore be more reliably determined (Thase, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also necessary for the comparator drugs to be used under standards of equal comparison. In particular, rapid dose titration should be used where indicated (for both comparator and test drug) to ensure the earliest possible improvement in the greatest number of patients (Montgomery et al, 2002). Finally, the level of severity of depression is another important factor in detecting early changes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been much research and controversy around the issue of how to measure the onset (Leon, 2001 ;Montgomery et al, 2002) and the nature of early clinical actions of ADs. Recent research has produced evidence counter to the notion that there is a time lag of several weeks between the almost immediate neurochemical actions of the drugs and changes in clinical behaviour (Gelenberg and Chesen, 2000 ;Katz et al, 1996Katz et al, /1997Parker et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a survival analytical approach which is generally considered to be the most rigorous and sensitive in detecting differences between antidepressant efficacy [44] and we focused on pragmatic outcome measures across a national health insurance database. This study contributes to reflections on a potential hierarchy among SSRIs and could be confirmed by larger pharmacoepidemiology studies with greater population representativeness and more clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%