2005
DOI: 10.1038/nature04429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismology: Tectonic strain in plate interiors? (Reply)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with geodetic measurements in the New Madrid seismic zone and surrounding regions, which show that the current strain rates are very slow (0 ± 2 mm/yr) (Newman et al, 1999;Gan and Prescott, 2001), rather than 5-8 mm/yr reported earlier (Liu et al, 1992). More recent GPS data have confi rmed the low strain rate around the New Madrid seismic zone (Smalley et al, 2005a); whether or not higher strain rates within the fault zone can be detected from present GPS data is debatable (Calais et al, 2005;Smalley et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result is consistent with geodetic measurements in the New Madrid seismic zone and surrounding regions, which show that the current strain rates are very slow (0 ± 2 mm/yr) (Newman et al, 1999;Gan and Prescott, 2001), rather than 5-8 mm/yr reported earlier (Liu et al, 1992). More recent GPS data have confi rmed the low strain rate around the New Madrid seismic zone (Smalley et al, 2005a); whether or not higher strain rates within the fault zone can be detected from present GPS data is debatable (Calais et al, 2005;Smalley et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Space‐geodetic measurements of surface strain [ Smalley et al , 2005a] have played an increasingly important role in evaluating the significance of seismic risk in the NMSZ. The recent geodetic inference of rapid strain rates [ Smalley et al , 2005a] has proved to be controversial and it has led to an ongoing debate [ Calais et al , 2005; Smalley et al , 2005b]. The utility of surface geodetic data in assessing seismic risk has been considered from the perspective of mechanical models [ Kenner and Segall , 2000] which indicate that measurements of low rates of strain should not be used to rule out the possibility of future damaging earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The New Madrid region was struck by four earthquakes of magnitude 7 or greater in 1811–1812 (Johnston & Schweig, ; Hough et al., ) and is currently undergoing low‐level seismic activity, with earthquakes rarely exceeding magnitude 3 (CERI, ; Page & Hough, ). Although once debated (Calais et al., ; Smalley et al., ), the current rate of strain accumulation on faults within the NMSZ is undistinguishable from zero, with a 95% confidence upper bound of 0.2 mm/year over about 500 km (Boyd et al., ; Craig & Calais, ).…”
Section: Seismological and Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%