2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismically induced rock slope failures resulting from topographic amplification of strong ground motions: The case of Pacoima Canyon, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boore, 1972;Geli et al, 1988;Benites and Haines, 1994;Sepúlveda et al, 2005;Bouckovalas and Papadimitriou, 2006;Buech, 2008;Meunier et al, 2008;Dhakal, 2009;Di Fiore, 2010). Results indicate that edifice shape, material stiffness, and the direction and frequency composition of the seismic input strongly influence the local topographic amplification or deamplification of seismic ground motions.…”
Section: Topographic Site-effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boore, 1972;Geli et al, 1988;Benites and Haines, 1994;Sepúlveda et al, 2005;Bouckovalas and Papadimitriou, 2006;Buech, 2008;Meunier et al, 2008;Dhakal, 2009;Di Fiore, 2010). Results indicate that edifice shape, material stiffness, and the direction and frequency composition of the seismic input strongly influence the local topographic amplification or deamplification of seismic ground motions.…”
Section: Topographic Site-effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this generic law is affected by different factors: (1) a significant over-abundance of landslides in the hanging walls of ruptured thrust faults relative to the footwalls rate are reported (e.g., [4,5]), showing the effect of the dynamics of the fault rupture on the landslide distribution; (2) the greater erosion rate due to precipitations observed after the earthquake [8,10] shows that earthquakes are found to interact non-linearly with precipitations; (3) the site effect, or amplification of the seismic waves due to shear-wave velocity contrast between the landslide material and the stable material [11,12] or topographical particularities like ridges [9]. This topographic control on co-seismic landslides has also been pointed out through different parameters: convexity [7], slopes, proximity from ridges and crests [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous factors, related both to the earthquake and to the settings in which the seismic waves propagate, drive the number, size and type of landslides. From the study of landslide inventories, it emerges that the triggering of landslides by earthquake is controlled by two main class of parameters: (i) the earthquake source properties (magnitude, duration, fault rupture dynamics) (e.g., [1,[3][4][5]); (ii) the site properties (geology, topography, geometry, water content) (e.g., [6][7][8][9]). The source magnitude controls the area affected by landslides [1] relating the ground motion decay with distance to the epicenter or to the fault plane (e.g., [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted worldwide during the last few decades that report on ground failures triggered by earthquakes (Bommer and Rodriguez, 2002;Sepulveda et al, 2005;Porfido et al, 2007;Tosatti et al, 2008;Gorum et al, 2011;Tang et al, 2011;Alfaro et al, 2012; among many others) and that forecast, using predictive models, the distribution scenarios of earthquake-induced ground effects (Sassa et al, 1996;Jibson et al, 2000;Prestininzi and Romeo, 2000;Romeo, 2000;Jibson, 2007;Hsieh and Lee, 2011;among others). These studies provide inventory maps of the effects that have occurred or susceptibility maps of expected ground failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%