2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of a Damage-Resistant Recentering Posttensioned-HYFRC Bridge Column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, [7,33,35,36] revealed that rocking piers can exhibit large drifts (around 6% to 10%) with minor damage and/or residual displacements. Recent experimental studies [37,27] showed that the residual drifts of posttensioned rocking columns are negligible (0.4%) compared to the pertinent drifts of conventional monolithic columns (6.8%) with the same peak drift ratios; in accordance with [32]. Further, [19,20] showed that the stability of the rigid rocking frame is enhanced, the more heavy its cap-beam is, regardless of the rise of its center of mass; a counter-intuitive behavior.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In particular, [7,33,35,36] revealed that rocking piers can exhibit large drifts (around 6% to 10%) with minor damage and/or residual displacements. Recent experimental studies [37,27] showed that the residual drifts of posttensioned rocking columns are negligible (0.4%) compared to the pertinent drifts of conventional monolithic columns (6.8%) with the same peak drift ratios; in accordance with [32]. Further, [19,20] showed that the stability of the rigid rocking frame is enhanced, the more heavy its cap-beam is, regardless of the rise of its center of mass; a counter-intuitive behavior.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Tobolski and Restrepo (2008) and Cohagen et al (2008) used spirals with a small pitch to confine the column ends. Billington and Yoon (2004), Trono et al (2014), and Tazarv and Saiidi (2015) replaced the column ends with a fiber-reinforced concrete shell, left hollow or filled with self-consolidating concrete. Tobolski and Restrepo (2008), Restrepo et al (2011), Guerrini and Restrepo (2013), and Guerrini et al (2014) investigated columns built with a dual steel shell (with concrete cast in between the shells) designed for composite action.…”
Section: Bridge Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains susceptible to compression damage, including spalling of concrete cover [27][28][29]. Use of HyFRC in rocking columns has been shown to be effective in resisting compression damage at the rocking plane, improving the overall ductility of the column [13,14]. To unbond the rebar, rubber mastic tape was tightly wrapped around the bars to build thickness between the ribs such that anchorage would be negligible.…”
Section: Design Of Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common fiber types include polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microfibers and hooked-end steel macrofibers. HyFRC has recently been investigated specifically for bridge column use, including static seismic testing [13] and dynamic shake table testing [14]. The experimental tests of the columns revealed significant resistances towards spalling and longitudinal rebar buckling compared to conventionally designed columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%