2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the union indicates the aggregation of the conditional probabilities for multiple parameters with multiple limit thresholds (Casciati et al, 2008). If the case is reduced to a bi-dimensional one considering, for instance, displacements and accelerations of a structure, the fragility is written in the following form:…”
Section: Comparison Between Spectral Approach and Nonlinear Dynamic Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the union indicates the aggregation of the conditional probabilities for multiple parameters with multiple limit thresholds (Casciati et al, 2008). If the case is reduced to a bi-dimensional one considering, for instance, displacements and accelerations of a structure, the fragility is written in the following form:…”
Section: Comparison Between Spectral Approach and Nonlinear Dynamic Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many numerical methods (i.e., the time domain analysis or frequency domain spectral method) have been proposed to assess both linear and nonlinear seismic responses of cable-stayed bridges under uniform or multisupport ground motions [6][7][8]. Moreover, many works focused on seismic control strategy and fragility analysis for cable-stayed bridges [9][10][11]. With regard to the shake table test of cable-stayed bridges, few studies have proposed to investigate the seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges, a few studies have been proposed recently to assess the seismic vulnerability of cable-stayed bridges. Casciati et al [9] assessed the seismic reliability of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge with passive hysteretic devices using fragility curves. Barnawi and Dyke [10] developed the fragility curves of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge equipped with three response modification systems, namely, active, semiactive, and passive devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear seismic response of cable-stayed bridges under both uniform and multi-support excitations has been investigated in some studies, using either the time domain analysis or frequency domain spectral analysis Abdel-Ghaffar, 1990, 1992;Abdel-Ghaffar, 1991;Allam and Datta, 1999]. Recently, many studies have focused on the seismic design and structural passive and semi-active control strategy for cable-stayed bridges [Dyke et al, 2003;Jung et al, 2003;Casciatia et al, 2008;Cámara Casado, 2011;Camara et al, 2013;Barnawi and Dyke, 2014]. It is concluded from these studies that cable-stayed bridges are sensitive to earthquakes because of their high flexibility and low inherent damping [Pacheco et al, 1993;Chang et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%