2011
DOI: 10.1080/13632461003642413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Performance of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Masonry: From Experimental Testing of the In-Plane Capacity of Walls to Building Response Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
52
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
9
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Penna and Calvi [3] have additionally carried out experiments of mechanical characterization on AAC units, hardened mortar and masonry wallets; some of them, in particular the vertical and the horizontal compression tests and diagonal compression tests (Figure 7a) on the masonry specimens, have been used in the present work to calibrate the numerical model. A type of AAC masonry similar to the one tested as infill has also been investigated by Costa et al [2], where in-plane cyclic tests, with cantilever boundary conditions, on load bearing masonry piers were performed at the University of Pavia on 4 panels with different dimensions and diverse applied vertical loads (Figure 7b). All the specimens were 2.75 m height and 0.30 m thick, however, the first 2 specimens had the same length (1.5 m) but they differed for the vertical load applied which was 200 kN and 300 kN, respectively.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Penna and Calvi [3] have additionally carried out experiments of mechanical characterization on AAC units, hardened mortar and masonry wallets; some of them, in particular the vertical and the horizontal compression tests and diagonal compression tests (Figure 7a) on the masonry specimens, have been used in the present work to calibrate the numerical model. A type of AAC masonry similar to the one tested as infill has also been investigated by Costa et al [2], where in-plane cyclic tests, with cantilever boundary conditions, on load bearing masonry piers were performed at the University of Pavia on 4 panels with different dimensions and diverse applied vertical loads (Figure 7b). All the specimens were 2.75 m height and 0.30 m thick, however, the first 2 specimens had the same length (1.5 m) but they differed for the vertical load applied which was 200 kN and 300 kN, respectively.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riccardo R. Milanesi, Paolo Morandi, Guido Magenes and Baris Binici A type of AAC masonry similar to the one tested as infill has also been investigated by Costa et al [2], where in-plane cyclic tests, with cantilever boundary conditions, on load bearing masonry piers were performed at the University of Pavia on 4 panels with different dimensions and diverse applied vertical loads (Figure 7b). All the specimens were 2.75 m height and 0.30 m thick, however, the first 2 specimens had the same length (1.5 m) but they differed for the vertical load applied which was 200 kN and 300 kN, respectively.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Along the same ways, several examples of experimental studies can be found in the literature, where cyclic in-plane tests were performed on masonry piers aiming to describe the different deformation limits at the structural element level for the two damage modes (flexural/rocking and shear failure mode) of the in-plane response of masonry structures (e.g. [25], [26], [27], [16]). …”
Section: Identification Of Suitable Limit States From Nonlinear Dynammentioning
confidence: 99%