1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.59.105008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Seiberg duality in supersymmetric gauge theories is the claim that two different theories describe the same physics in the infrared limit. However, one cannot easily work out physical quantities in strongly coupled theories and hence it has been difficult to compare the physics of the electric and magnetic theories. In order to gain more insight into the equivalence of two theories, we study the ''e ϩ e Ϫ '' cross sections into ''hadrons'' for both theories in the superconformal window. We describe a technique… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
147
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly convenient choice turns out to be tan 2 θ on the logarithmic scale, first used in [19] to describe 3-family MSW oscillations. In addition to covering the range 0 < θ < π/2, it also does not introduce any unphysical singularity around θ = π/4 (unlike the traditional sin 2 2θ, see [17]) and makes it easy to see where in the vacuum oscillation region the evolution in the Sun becomes completely nonadiabatic (points θ and π/2 − θ become equivalent, so that solutions become symmetric with respect to the θ = π/4 line).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A particularly convenient choice turns out to be tan 2 θ on the logarithmic scale, first used in [19] to describe 3-family MSW oscillations. In addition to covering the range 0 < θ < π/2, it also does not introduce any unphysical singularity around θ = π/4 (unlike the traditional sin 2 2θ, see [17]) and makes it easy to see where in the vacuum oscillation region the evolution in the Sun becomes completely nonadiabatic (points θ and π/2 − θ become equivalent, so that solutions become symmetric with respect to the θ = π/4 line).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We advocate the second option as a better physical choice, because it makes manifest the continuity of physics around the maximal mixing [17,18]. The parametrization 0 < θ < π/2 requires one to reexamine the choice of a variable for plots, because the traditional variable sin 2 2θ is not suitable for this purpose [17]. While either θ or sin 2 θ would be adequate for plotting only the QVO region, neither choice allows one to take a global view of the neutrino parameter space and show all solutions, including the SMA and (quasi)vacuum oscillation solutions, on the same plot [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we investigate the effect of passage through matter on neutrino oscillations. We specifically consider the Large Angle MSW scenario (LAM) [7], which, as defined in the recent Fermilab six month physics study [8], has…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MSSM context one may treat ξ as a free parameter at the weak scale [8], in which case there is no need to knowβ ξ . However, if…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%