2015
DOI: 10.1177/1362480615576271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics

Abstract: Communications technologies are being used in varying ways to perpetrate and extend the harm of sexual violence and harassment against women and girls. Yet little scholarship has explored the uses of communications technologies, to support reporting, investigation and prosecution of sexual assault, nor indeed less formal mechanisms of justice. In this article, I contend that communications technologies are not simply new tools for conventional formal justice, but rather that these technologies are mediating ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Corien Prins (2011) has advocated for a sub-field of e-victimology exploring how digital participation facilitates new practices for self-help and self-activism, as well as the increased potential for threats to victims' well-being and privacy. Similarly, Anastasia Powell (2014Powell ( , 2015 and Bianca Fileborn (2014) have examined emerging 'informal justice' practices of victim-survivors and their advocates in response to sexual violence and street harassment operating in civil society. Meanwhile, some scholars have also raised concerns surrounding informal justice processes embracing the use of technologies, highlighting the potential for a digital media 'pillory' (see Hess and Waller 2014) 2013) whereby digital vigilantism can result in injustices, harassment and violence towards alleged offenders.…”
Section: Digital Justice and 'Digilantism'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Corien Prins (2011) has advocated for a sub-field of e-victimology exploring how digital participation facilitates new practices for self-help and self-activism, as well as the increased potential for threats to victims' well-being and privacy. Similarly, Anastasia Powell (2014Powell ( , 2015 and Bianca Fileborn (2014) have examined emerging 'informal justice' practices of victim-survivors and their advocates in response to sexual violence and street harassment operating in civil society. Meanwhile, some scholars have also raised concerns surrounding informal justice processes embracing the use of technologies, highlighting the potential for a digital media 'pillory' (see Hess and Waller 2014) 2013) whereby digital vigilantism can result in injustices, harassment and violence towards alleged offenders.…”
Section: Digital Justice and 'Digilantism'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps victimsurvivors might disclose online because they want to have their story heard or to find a community that can offer support (Powell 2015a). Victim-survivors have written about their experiences on personal blogs or, for example, shared their stories with online communities such as 'Project Unbreakable' on Tumblr (Fawcett and Shrestha 2016;Powell 2015aPowell , 2015b. This Tumblr community is a space for victim-survivors to share images, typically of themselves holding a paper sign detailing narratives of their abuse, without naming the perpetrator.…”
Section: From Disclosure To Digilantism: Why Are Victim-survivors Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She also notes that, by sharing about their experiences online, victim-survivors might be meeting their 'justice needs' of having a voice, being believed, being heard and having control over their experience (Fileborn 2014 2011;McGlynn, Westmarland and Godden 2012). Some criminologists have begun to explore how victim-survivors might fulfil these justice needs through digital platforms (Fileborn 2014;Powell 2015b;Salter 2013). …”
Section: From Disclosure To Digilantism: Why Are Victim-survivors Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations