1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<235::aid-bdm299>3.0.co;2-x
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Seek and ye shall find: test results are what you hypothesize they are

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
21
1
1
0

Citation Types

0
7
0
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
20
2

Relationship

2
20

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 22 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 12 publications

0
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is plausible for an overall appraisal of a candidate and an assessment of his or her performance in a specific test to be positively correlated so that considering one while examining the other seems to be reasonable. However, it is doubtful that individuals can assign the preliminary information the “correct” weight, rather than rely on it overly, as indicated by ample studies (e.g., Ben‐Shakhar et al., 1998). These considerations led us to try to reduce reliance on preliminary information by means of instructions to disregard, and an array of interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…It is plausible for an overall appraisal of a candidate and an assessment of his or her performance in a specific test to be positively correlated so that considering one while examining the other seems to be reasonable. However, it is doubtful that individuals can assign the preliminary information the “correct” weight, rather than rely on it overly, as indicated by ample studies (e.g., Ben‐Shakhar et al., 1998). These considerations led us to try to reduce reliance on preliminary information by means of instructions to disregard, and an array of interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Confirmation bias has been observed also in the domains of scientific research (Greenhoot et al, 2004), medical decision-making (Graber et al, 2005; Kohn et al, 2000; Ludolph & Schulz, 2018; O’Sullivan & Schofield, 2018; Wallsten, 1981), psychiatric diagnoses (Langer & Abelson, 1974), clinical psychology (Ben-Shakhar et al, 1998; Zapf et al, 2018), and other contexts. Researchers have also identified the reciprocal “disconfirmation bias,” by which evidence that is incompatible with one’s beliefs is dismissed or perceived as too weak to affect the conclusion (Edwards & Smith, 1996; Taber et al, 2009).…”
Section: Applying Coherence-based Reasoning To Biased Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…This bias is ubiquitous, influencing judgments across a broad variety of contexts, and of substantial current concern as it relates to the reproducibility crisis confronting science (Forstmeier, Wagenmakers, & Parker, 2017). It has been observed in economics (Jones & Sugden, 2001), emergency medical decision making (Pines, 2006), psychodiagnosis (Ben-Shakhar, Bar-Hillel, Bilu, & Shefler, 1998), and political beliefs (Taber & Lodge, 2006). Evidence for confirmation bias has also been observed in forensic settings, demonstrating that all stages of This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Contaminated Polygraph Charts Is Vulnerabl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.