1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<235::aid-bdm299>3.0.co;2-x
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Seek and ye shall find: test results are what you hypothesize they are
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
21
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
7
0
0
Year Published
2001
2023
Publication Types
Select...
20
2
Relationship
2
20
Authors
Journals
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
References 12 publications
0
7
0
0
“…It is plausible for an overall appraisal of a candidate and an assessment of his or her performance in a specific test to be positively correlated so that considering one while examining the other seems to be reasonable. However, it is doubtful that individuals can assign the preliminary information the “correct” weight, rather than rely on it overly, as indicated by ample studies (e.g., Ben‐Shakhar et al., 1998). These considerations led us to try to reduce reliance on preliminary information by means of instructions to disregard, and an array of interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is plausible for an overall appraisal of a candidate and an assessment of his or her performance in a specific test to be positively correlated so that considering one while examining the other seems to be reasonable. However, it is doubtful that individuals can assign the preliminary information the “correct” weight, rather than rely on it overly, as indicated by ample studies (e.g., Ben‐Shakhar et al., 1998). These considerations led us to try to reduce reliance on preliminary information by means of instructions to disregard, and an array of interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmation bias has been observed also in the domains of scientific research (Greenhoot et al, 2004), medical decision-making (Graber et al, 2005; Kohn et al, 2000; Ludolph & Schulz, 2018; O’Sullivan & Schofield, 2018; Wallsten, 1981), psychiatric diagnoses (Langer & Abelson, 1974), clinical psychology (Ben-Shakhar et al, 1998; Zapf et al, 2018), and other contexts. Researchers have also identified the reciprocal “disconfirmation bias,” by which evidence that is incompatible with one’s beliefs is dismissed or perceived as too weak to affect the conclusion (Edwards & Smith, 1996; Taber et al, 2009).…”
Section: Applying Coherence-based Reasoning To Biased Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bias is ubiquitous, influencing judgments across a broad variety of contexts, and of substantial current concern as it relates to the reproducibility crisis confronting science (Forstmeier, Wagenmakers, & Parker, 2017). It has been observed in economics (Jones & Sugden, 2001), emergency medical decision making (Pines, 2006), psychodiagnosis (Ben-Shakhar, Bar-Hillel, Bilu, & Shefler, 1998), and political beliefs (Taber & Lodge, 2006). Evidence for confirmation bias has also been observed in forensic settings, demonstrating that all stages of This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Contaminated Polygraph Charts Is Vulnerabl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
