2009
DOI: 10.1080/13540600903139555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing self as others see you: variability in self‐efficacy ratings in student teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true concerning values such as willingness to work, and motivation. Previous research has found similar results (Çakır & Alıcı, 2009). Critical reflective action efforts may help reduce this gap (Adams, 2010;Alger, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is especially true concerning values such as willingness to work, and motivation. Previous research has found similar results (Çakır & Alıcı, 2009). Critical reflective action efforts may help reduce this gap (Adams, 2010;Alger, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Few studies have focused on others ratings of teachers' educational practices (Arnon & Reichel, 2007;Çakır & Alıcı, 2009). For example, when perceptions of pre-service teachers about their teaching competence are compared to the ratings of the teaching competence as rated by instructors, self-evaluations are usually higher (Çakır & Alıcı, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…factors that foster self-efficacy of learners were studied. Çakır and Alıcı (2009), for example, found that past experiences and social persuasions fostered the development of selfefficacy. Similarly, Wangand Pape (2007) announced that past experiences, interest, and attitudes towards English language play significant roles in the development of self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de fait, la majorité des échelles relatives au seP des enseignants comporte très peu d'énoncés (1 à 5) sur la gestion de classe (p. ex., Betoret, 2009 ;Çakir & alici, 2009 ;dussault, villeneuve, & deaudelin, 2001 ;Friedman, 2003 ;Friedman & Kass, 2002 ;Gibson & dembo, 1984 ;Meijer & Foster, 1988 ;Paneque & Barbetta, 2006 ;rich, lev, & Fischer, 1996 ;rimm-Kaufman & sawyer, 2004 ;schwarzer & Hallum, 2008 ;siwatu, 2007 ;skaalvik & skaalvik, 2007 ;Woolfson & Brady, 2009 ;Yoon, 2004). d'autres échelles présentent un plus grand nombre d'énoncés sur le sujet (de 6 à 14), mais n'abordent toutefois que quelques-unes des cinq dimensions de la gestion de classe recensées par o'neill et stephenson (2011).…”
Section: Une Synthèse Des Questionnaires Relatifs Au Sep Des Enseignantsunclassified