2004
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0426:sssaps]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seedling sulfide sensitivity among plant species colonizing Phragmites-infested wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most obvious competitive advantage for Phragmites arises from its tall shoots (3 m), which shade the much shorter native salt marsh plants (0.2-0.8 m). Phragmites also possesses a tolerance to physical and chemical stresses associated with tidal flooding, demonstrated by its ability to flourish in soil with pore water salinities up to 15-20 ppt (Lissner and Schierup 1997;Konisky and Burdick 2004;Vasquez et al 2005) and soil pore water hydrogen sulfide up to 0.3-0.4 mM (Chambers et al 1999;Seliskar et al 2004). Further enhancing the success of Phragmites is its ability to avoid the stresses of waterlogging and toxic hydrogen sulfides by oxygenating its rhizosphere (Haslam 1972) and reducing tidal flooding by increasing marsh surface elevation (Windham and Lathrop 1999;Warren et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious competitive advantage for Phragmites arises from its tall shoots (3 m), which shade the much shorter native salt marsh plants (0.2-0.8 m). Phragmites also possesses a tolerance to physical and chemical stresses associated with tidal flooding, demonstrated by its ability to flourish in soil with pore water salinities up to 15-20 ppt (Lissner and Schierup 1997;Konisky and Burdick 2004;Vasquez et al 2005) and soil pore water hydrogen sulfide up to 0.3-0.4 mM (Chambers et al 1999;Seliskar et al 2004). Further enhancing the success of Phragmites is its ability to avoid the stresses of waterlogging and toxic hydrogen sulfides by oxygenating its rhizosphere (Haslam 1972) and reducing tidal flooding by increasing marsh surface elevation (Windham and Lathrop 1999;Warren et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of anoxic conditions and large tidal input of sulfate, porewater sulfide concentrations are normally high in these waterlogged areas, sometimes exceeding 1.5 mM (Chambers 1997;Bart and Hartman 2000). Typical sulfide concentrations of marshes constrain ammonium uptake (Chambers et al 1998), ATP production (Fu¨rtig et al 1996), and limit growth in rhizome-born culms (Chambers 1997; Bart and Hartman 2000) and seedlings (Seliskar et al 2004). Finally, high marshes, barring physical disturbance, exhibit a tight vegetation cover (Bertness et al 2002) that could out-compete seedlings or isolated emerging rhizome-born culms for light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much data have accumulated on the control effectiveness of glyphosate herbicide (Moreira et al 1999;Ailstock et al 2001;Warren et al 2001;Turner and Warren 2003), salinity and flooding (Hellings and Gallagher 1992;Lissner and Schierup 1997;Chambers et al 1998;Vasquez et al 2005), and increased sulfide concentration (Chambers et al 2003;Seliskar et al 2004) in controlling Phragmites growth. While the effects of these factors on the aboveground culms of the plant are easily observed, the effects on the underground reserves and buds of the rhizomes are more difficult to detect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%