2012
DOI: 10.1111/ips.12002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securitization of Migration in Greece: Process, Motives, and Implications

Abstract: The field of security is largely controlled by elites who, by virtue of their authority, are able to create an image of an enemy which is largely independent of the objective significance of a threat. However, a narrow focus on speech acts and discourse analysis to study such processes of securitization is inherently inadequate. This article provides a panoramic account of Greek migration politics during the 1990s. It shows that securitization can be discursive or nondiscursive, pre‐mediated or subconscious, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowhere is the constructed nexus between immigration and crime more acute than in the case of irregular migrants, who, before anything else, are ascribed a criminal label by mere dint of their irregular status itself (see further Cheliotis, 2013a, 2013b; also Tzanelli, 2006;Karamanidou, 2007;Karyotis, 2012). A series of important facts are obscured by this discourse: that crime in Greece has remained moderate by European standards; that Greeks are still responsible for the bulk of offences committed, and that their participation has in recent years grown substantially in the case of certain key property and violent offences (e.g., thefts, burglaries, robberies, homicides); and that there are strong antiforeigner biases in police practices and judicial decision-making processes, which inflate the proportional share of immigrants in crime and prison statistics (see further Papandreou, 2009;Xenakis, 2010, 2011;Xenakis and Cheliotis, 2013b).…”
Section: Political Discourse and Public Attitudes About Immigrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowhere is the constructed nexus between immigration and crime more acute than in the case of irregular migrants, who, before anything else, are ascribed a criminal label by mere dint of their irregular status itself (see further Cheliotis, 2013a, 2013b; also Tzanelli, 2006;Karamanidou, 2007;Karyotis, 2012). A series of important facts are obscured by this discourse: that crime in Greece has remained moderate by European standards; that Greeks are still responsible for the bulk of offences committed, and that their participation has in recent years grown substantially in the case of certain key property and violent offences (e.g., thefts, burglaries, robberies, homicides); and that there are strong antiforeigner biases in police practices and judicial decision-making processes, which inflate the proportional share of immigrants in crime and prison statistics (see further Papandreou, 2009;Xenakis, 2010, 2011;Xenakis and Cheliotis, 2013b).…”
Section: Political Discourse and Public Attitudes About Immigrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While migrants, especially for Balkan and Eastern European countries, provided flexible, cheap, and easily exploited labor that served the needs of the Greek economy in the 1990s and 2000s, migration itself was associated with criminality and illegality (Triandafyllidou & Maroukis, 2012). Unauthorized migration flows into Greece in particular were constructed as threats to the cultural identity and security of the country (Karyotis, 2012;Triandafyllidou & Maroukis, 2012), in parallel with an emphasis on preventing migration flows in the context of EU migration policies. In addition, the Greek citizenship regime is underpinned by a conception of national identity based on shared culture and common descent remained largely exclusionary toward migrants.…”
Section: Exploring Constructions Of An Emigrant Past In the Greek Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Securitisation occurs when actors, speaking or acting in the name of a referent object, succeed in convincing an empowering audience that the perceived seriousness of a threat, regardless of its objective significance, justifies the mobilisation of all available resources to curtail its development. While conceptual ambiguities 13 Karyotis (2012). 14 Lavenex (2001).…”
Section: Elite Rationality and Securitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…120 Guiraudon (2000). 121 See Karyotis (2012). 122 Ekathimerini (2012). operations had taken place throughout the 1990s in pre-election periods.…”
Section: Agent Benefiting Securitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%