2015
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2014.2375571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure Outsourced Biometric Authentication With Performance Evaluation on Smartphones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of all classifiers was evaluated on four different datasets using false accept rate (FAR), false reject rate (FRR), Half Total Error Rates (HTER), and Area Under the Curve (AUC) [16,28,29]. HTER is defined as the average of FAR and FRR.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of all classifiers was evaluated on four different datasets using false accept rate (FAR), false reject rate (FRR), Half Total Error Rates (HTER), and Area Under the Curve (AUC) [16,28,29]. HTER is defined as the average of FAR and FRR.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing contextual authentication proposals, summarised in Table 1, use device measurements in unprotected form-giving rise to privacy concerns especially when authentication decisions are outsourced to a remote server [8,23,28]. As noted previously, studies have already shown that users are generally reluctant towards disclosing, in particular, their GPS location to device applications [3][4][5]9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paillier [19], and garbled circuits for two-party computation (2PC) [8,12,23,28]. However, challenges still remain with respect computational complexity and storage overhead, which is exemplified by worst cases of 31.2s and 45.9s to compute authentication decisions in [8] and [28] respectively. Storage complexity is also an issue, with 4-175MB required for computing a single authentication decision in [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently,Sedȇnka et. al proposed another secure protocol for biometric comparison [42]. They reported various time costs according to different settings.…”
Section: Compare With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%