1981
DOI: 10.1093/nar/9.14.3287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary structure of the large subunit ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli, Zea mays chloroplast, and human and mouse mitochondrial ribosomes

Abstract: Short base-paired RNA fragments, and fragments containing intra-RNA cross-links, were isolated from E. coli 23S rRNA or 50S ribosomal subunits by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The interactions thus found were used as a first basis for constructing a secondary structure model of the 23S rRNA. Sequence comparison with the 23S rDNA from Z. mays chloroplasts, as well as with the 16S (large subunit) rDNA from human and mouse mitochondria, enabled the experimental model to be improved and extrapolated to give… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
104
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
104
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main effort has concentrated on the E. coli 16S and 23S rRNA, and three essentially similar secondary structure models were proposed for both molecules (16S RNA: Stiegler et al, 198 1a;Zwieb et al, 1981;and 23S RNA: Glotz et al, 1981;Branlant et al, 1981). In each case the structures were derived by a two-track approach, involving firstly the collection of experimental data from the E. coli RNA and secondly phylogenetic comparisons with ribosomal RNA sequences from other organisms (reviewed by Brimacombe et al, 1983;Woese et al, 1983;Noller, 1984).…”
Section: Primary Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main effort has concentrated on the E. coli 16S and 23S rRNA, and three essentially similar secondary structure models were proposed for both molecules (16S RNA: Stiegler et al, 198 1a;Zwieb et al, 1981;and 23S RNA: Glotz et al, 1981;Branlant et al, 1981). In each case the structures were derived by a two-track approach, involving firstly the collection of experimental data from the E. coli RNA and secondly phylogenetic comparisons with ribosomal RNA sequences from other organisms (reviewed by Brimacombe et al, 1983;Woese et al, 1983;Noller, 1984).…”
Section: Primary Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1), namely-in the case of the small subunit-for mammalian mitochondrial 12S RNA (e.g. Stiegler et al, 1981b;Zwieb et al, 1981) (Kuntzel & K6chel, 1981;Gray et al, 1984). In the case of the large subunit, models have been published for mammalian mitochondrial 16S RNA (e.g.…”
Section: Primary Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due both to its known location at subunit interface and to direct experimental evidence [6,13,14], the 3'-te rminal domain of small subunit rRNA appears to be more directly involved in these functions. A more precise knowledge of its role should be gained from comparative RNA sequence analysis which has proved valuable for establishing secondary structure models for prokaryotic rRNAs [15][16][17]. Among eukaryotes, yeast [ 18] and Xenopus [ 19] are the only complete 18 S rRNA sequences published so far; their comparison has revealed extensive stretches of high homology interspersed with heterologous tracts while conserved sequences with prokaryotes are clearly restricted to the 3'-terminal region of the molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%