2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2015.2473002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary-Side-Regulated Soft-Switching Full-Bridge Three-Port Converter Based on Bridgeless Boost Rectifier and Bidirectional Converter For Multiple Energy Interface

Abstract: A systematic method for deriving soft-switching three-port converters (TPCs), which can interface multiple energy, is proposed in this paper. Novel full-bridge (FB) TPCs featuring single-stage power conversion, reduced conduction loss and low voltage stress are derived. Two non-isolated bidirectional power ports and one isolated unidirectional load port are provided by integrating an interleaved bidirectional Buck/Boost converter and a bridgeless Boost rectifier via a high frequency transformer. The switching … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the performance and feasibility of the proposed converter and understand the advantages and disadvantages of its architecture, this section presents a comparison of the proposed converter with those in the literature. As presented in Table 1, the proposed converter is separately compared with a bidirectional converter [17,21,22] and a three-port converter [23][24][25]. The bidirectional converter in [17] uses a clamp capacitor to reduce the voltage stress and recover stray energy, thereby improving the efficiency of the conversion circuit.…”
Section: Performance Comparison and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To demonstrate the performance and feasibility of the proposed converter and understand the advantages and disadvantages of its architecture, this section presents a comparison of the proposed converter with those in the literature. As presented in Table 1, the proposed converter is separately compared with a bidirectional converter [17,21,22] and a three-port converter [23][24][25]. The bidirectional converter in [17] uses a clamp capacitor to reduce the voltage stress and recover stray energy, thereby improving the efficiency of the conversion circuit.…”
Section: Performance Comparison and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology not only increases the cost, but also increases the conduction loss. Table 2 shows a comparison of the proposed converter with other three-port converters [23][24][25]. The converter in [23] includes an interleaved step-up full-bridge conversion circuit in which switches and diodes are shared to achieve three conversion modes.…”
Section: Performance Comparison and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, like other phase-shift zero-voltage switching (ZVS) converters, the duty cycle loss issue due to the leakage inductance still occurs. A FB TPC with duty cycle and phase-shift control derived from an interleaved boost-full-bridge (BFB) and a bridgeless boost rectifier is presented in [27]. This topology reduces the input current ripple and current stress of the input ports because of the 180° phase-shift operation of the primary switching legs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%