Second victims and quality of support resources among cardiology professionals

Bañeras, Jordi; Jorge-Pérez, Pablo; Bonanad, Clara; Lluva, María Thiscal López; Moll, Isaac; Kinori, Sara Guila Fidel

doi:10.1016/j.rec.2022.01.012

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although another questionnaire has also been developed for this purpose—SeViD‐I survey (Strametz et al, 2021 )—the SVEST is by far the most used instrument worldwide for the study of the second victim phenomenon, having been translated, adapted and validated in multiple countries and settings (Ajoudani et al, 2021 ; Brunelli et al, 2018 ; Chen et al, 2019 ; Kim et al, 2020 ; Knudsen et al, 2021 ; Mok et al, 2020 ; Scarpis et al, 2021 ; Winning et al, 2020 ). The SVEST‐E has also been used recently in Spain to assess the feeling of second victim among cardiology healthcare personnel (Bañeras et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feelings of being a second victim among Spanish midwives and obstetricians

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of feelings of being a second victim among midwives and obstetricians in Spain and to explore possible differences between the two professions. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive‐analytical observational study. Methods An online survey collecting several variables was administered throughout the Spanish territory. Spanish version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) was used. The data collection period was from May to December 2020. Results A total sample of 719 obstetricians and midwives were studied. There were significant differences between the two groups with respect to seven dimensions of SVEST: greater feelings of being a second victim among obstetricians in the dimensions physical distress/ p ≤ .001, non‐work‐related support/ p ≤ .001 and absenteeism/ p ≤ .001 and greater feelings of being a second victim among midwives in the dimensions psychological distress/ p ≤ .001, supervisor support/ p = .011, professional self‐efficacy/ p ≤ .001 and intention to change jobs/ p ≤ .001.

show abstract