2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.16366
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second release of the CoRe database of binary neutron star merger waveforms

Abstract: We present the second data release of gravitational waveforms from binary neutron star merger simulations performed by the Computational Relativity (CoRe) collaboration. The current database consists of 254 different binary neutron star configurations and a total of 590 individual numerical-relativity simulations using various grid resolutions. The released waveform data contain the strain and the Weyl curvature multipoles up to = m = 4. They span a significant portion of the mass, mass-ratio, spin and eccentr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we select two sets of filter parameters (Table 1) based on obtaining good overlap (0.82) between our Filter 1 (red, Fig. 1) and the numericalrelativity simulation THC0036 (Dietrich et al 2018;Gonzalez et al 2022). This numerical-relativity waveform uses the SLy equation of state (Douchin & Haensel 2001) for a 1.35 + 1.35 M neutronstar merger (Fig 1,dashed line).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we select two sets of filter parameters (Table 1) based on obtaining good overlap (0.82) between our Filter 1 (red, Fig. 1) and the numericalrelativity simulation THC0036 (Dietrich et al 2018;Gonzalez et al 2022). This numerical-relativity waveform uses the SLy equation of state (Douchin & Haensel 2001) for a 1.35 + 1.35 M neutronstar merger (Fig 1,dashed line).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a cold piecewise polytropic EOS [80] approximating the ALF2 EOS [81] for the neutron star. This prototypical stiff EOS predicts the radius of a 1.4 M ⊙ neutron star to be R 1.4 ∼ 12.32 km [82], has a maximum mass of ∼ 2.0M ⊙ for non-spinning stars [81], and is consistent with pulsar observations [83][84][85][86][87], with both electromagnetic and gravitational wave observations [88][89][90][91][92][93] of the binary neutron star event GW170817 [94], as well as the gravitational wave observations of GW190814 [95] and GW190425 [96]. Thermal effects are added to the zero-temperature polytrope with an additional pressure contribution of the form p th = (Γ th − 1)ρϵ.…”
Section: B Initial Data and Cases Consideredmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We adopt a description of the time-domain waveform, similar to that in [26], with the assumption that we can write the source emission as a multipolar expansion of oscillatory mode functions. Specifically, we assume the h + and h × emitted along a line of observation from a given source can be characterized by an expansion in spin-weighted spherical harmonics [27,28]:…”
Section: Waveform Assumptions and Model Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the size of current modeling uncertainties, however, we show an example comparing waveform models from lalsimulation [39] and simulations from the CoRe library [28]. This illustrates both the current model differences as well as a possible application of this error budget calculation A(f ) and ϕ(f ).…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimates For Current Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation