1985
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Sebaceous Carcinoma of the Eyelid Masquerading as Superior Limbic Keratoconjunctivitis
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
27
5
0
0
Citation Types
0
8
0
0
Year Published
Range
1986
19862026
2026Publication Types
Select...
24
7
1
Relationship
0
32
Authors
Journals
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
References 13 publications
0
8
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Other neoplasias that demonstrate pannus include corneal intraepithelial neoplasia, primary acquired melanosis sine pigmento, benign hereditary intraepithelial dyskeratosis, and intraepithelial spread of a primary eyelid adenocarcinoma (eg, mucoepidermoid carcinoma). 2,3 In patients with corneal surface disease with or without eyelid findings, sebaceous cell carcinoma should be considered. …”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Other neoplasias that demonstrate pannus include corneal intraepithelial neoplasia, primary acquired melanosis sine pigmento, benign hereditary intraepithelial dyskeratosis, and intraepithelial spread of a primary eyelid adenocarcinoma (eg, mucoepidermoid carcinoma). 2,3 In patients with corneal surface disease with or without eyelid findings, sebaceous cell carcinoma should be considered. …”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The tumor is frequently mistaken for blepharoconjunctivitis or a chalazion which results in delayed diagnosis and poor prognosis. 8 The mortality rate is 5-10% because of delayed diagnosis and treatment. The distant metastasis has 25% mortality rate.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There is compelling anecdotal evidence that intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia of each pattern (and mixed) can extend centimetres from invasive sites without noticeable thickening of the conjunctiva or the skin, diminishing which diminishes clinical suspicious of surface involvement (figure 2). 28 29 Occult surface spread to this extent makes it an intuitive risk factor for local recurrence or other unfavourable outcomes if not addressed in management strategies. The conflicting results reported in the literature regarding the prognostic implications of intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia must be interpreted in the context of the inconsistent use of terminology, variable and uncontrolled treatment protocols, and the limited examination of tissues occurring in retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Other neoplasias that demonstrate pannus include corneal intraepithelial neoplasia, primary acquired melanosis sine pigmento, benign hereditary intraepithelial dyskeratosis, and intraepithelial spread of a primary eyelid adenocarcinoma (eg, mucoepidermoid carcinoma). 2,3 In patients with corneal surface disease with or without eyelid findings, sebaceous cell carcinoma should be considered. …”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The tumor is frequently mistaken for blepharoconjunctivitis or a chalazion which results in delayed diagnosis and poor prognosis. 8 The mortality rate is 5-10% because of delayed diagnosis and treatment. The distant metastasis has 25% mortality rate.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There is compelling anecdotal evidence that intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia of each pattern (and mixed) can extend centimetres from invasive sites without noticeable thickening of the conjunctiva or the skin, diminishing which diminishes clinical suspicious of surface involvement (figure 2). 28 29 Occult surface spread to this extent makes it an intuitive risk factor for local recurrence or other unfavourable outcomes if not addressed in management strategies. The conflicting results reported in the literature regarding the prognostic implications of intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia must be interpreted in the context of the inconsistent use of terminology, variable and uncontrolled treatment protocols, and the limited examination of tissues occurring in retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Other neoplasias that demonstrate pannus include corneal intraepithelial neoplasia, primary acquired melanosis sine pigmento, benign hereditary intraepithelial dyskeratosis, and intraepithelial spread of a primary eyelid adenocarcinoma (eg, mucoepidermoid carcinoma). 2,3 In patients with corneal surface disease with or without eyelid findings, sebaceous cell carcinoma should be considered. …”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The tumor is frequently mistaken for blepharoconjunctivitis or a chalazion which results in delayed diagnosis and poor prognosis. 8 The mortality rate is 5-10% because of delayed diagnosis and treatment. The distant metastasis has 25% mortality rate.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There is compelling anecdotal evidence that intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia of each pattern (and mixed) can extend centimetres from invasive sites without noticeable thickening of the conjunctiva or the skin, diminishing which diminishes clinical suspicious of surface involvement (figure 2). 28 29 Occult surface spread to this extent makes it an intuitive risk factor for local recurrence or other unfavourable outcomes if not addressed in management strategies. The conflicting results reported in the literature regarding the prognostic implications of intraepithelial sebaceous neoplasia must be interpreted in the context of the inconsistent use of terminology, variable and uncontrolled treatment protocols, and the limited examination of tissues occurring in retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%