2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation of aflatoxin M1 contamination in industrial and traditional Iranian dairy products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
56
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
10
56
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, artisans often makes use of only one milk source, which can occasionally be contaminated with high AFM1 levels (although within the legal limit) thus determining a peak of contamination which would be found also in the derived cheese, while industrial production uses dilution of milk from various sources. This finding is in contrast to that recently obtained by Fallah et al (2011). On the other hand, contrary to what appears at first sight from the data shown in Table 3, maturation does not influence AFM1 content in cheese.…”
Section: Correlation Of Aflatoxin M1contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, artisans often makes use of only one milk source, which can occasionally be contaminated with high AFM1 levels (although within the legal limit) thus determining a peak of contamination which would be found also in the derived cheese, while industrial production uses dilution of milk from various sources. This finding is in contrast to that recently obtained by Fallah et al (2011). On the other hand, contrary to what appears at first sight from the data shown in Table 3, maturation does not influence AFM1 content in cheese.…”
Section: Correlation Of Aflatoxin M1contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, cheese made with cows' milk showed itself to be more contaminated than cheese made with goat or sheep (or mixed goat/sheep, mixed goat/cow and sheep/cow) milk. This result agrees with the previous observation that milk from goats and sheep is less contaminated than cows' milk, both because of the different digestive apparatuses and mechanism of AFB1 assimilation of animals, and for the different feeding used in cow's breeding compared to ovine and caprine (Barbiroli et al, 2007;Hussain et al, 2010;Fallah et al, 2011). In fact, cattle fodders are more likely to be contaminated with AFB1 than those used to feed sheep and goats.…”
Section: Correlation Of Aflatoxin M1supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TLC analysis for mycotoxins is still popular for both qualitative and quantitative determinations [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Silica gel layers seem to be the most common stationary phases used for such investigations.…”
Section: Figure 2 Ochratoxins Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Fallah et al, 2011), enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA) (Atasever et al, 2010;Tekinşen and Eken, 2008) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection, HPLC with tandem mass spectrometric detection (Aguilera-Luiz et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2012), were some of them used for Aflatoxin detection. Since HPLC methods are specific and sensitive, it is more preferable than other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%