2012
DOI: 10.5094/apr.2012.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal effects in land use regression models for nitrogen dioxide, coarse particulate matter, and gaseous ammonia in Cleveland, Ohio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher NO 2 wintertime concentrations have also been found in other LUR studies in Dallas and Cleveland during winter and summer seasons using the same sampling methods (Smith et al, 2011, Mukerjee et al, 2011). Both the 2006–7 and 1999 LURs were developed using NO 2 concentrations measured during the cool season months and their NO 2 predictions were most highly correlated for these months (ρ = 0.91).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher NO 2 wintertime concentrations have also been found in other LUR studies in Dallas and Cleveland during winter and summer seasons using the same sampling methods (Smith et al, 2011, Mukerjee et al, 2011). Both the 2006–7 and 1999 LURs were developed using NO 2 concentrations measured during the cool season months and their NO 2 predictions were most highly correlated for these months (ρ = 0.91).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The over prediction could be partially explained by overall lower regional NO 2 ambient levels in 2006, as reported by the EPA National Air Trends website. Nonetheless, explicit distinction between warm and cool seasons in the LURs developed here has also been found to be significant in LURs developed in Cleveland (Mukerjee et al, 2011). If the health issue being studied has a seasonal aspect, it would be beneficial for the corresponding LURs to account for this distinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…(Eeftens et al 2012b). In a recent study from Ohio, Mukerjee et al (2012) reported an R 2 of 0.78 for their LUR model. Because this was not derived from cross-validation in which some data are withheld from the model-building step for validation, however, the predictive power would be inflated due to overfitting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukerjee et al (2012), Reche et al (2012), Zhu et al (2011), andVallius et al (2004) examine the measurement studies carried out only one period (summer or winter) during different periods. Similarly, these studies suggest that the level of air pollution differs according to the measurement period.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these studies differ according to the size of study area, land use, meteorological and topographical factors and population density in the regions. Fan et al (2012), Mansha et al (2012), Mukerjee (2012), Pits et al (2008), Moore et al (2007) and Querola et al (2001) focus on urban studies which observe the level of urban air pollution in different cities all around the world. They suggest that the concentrations of air pollutants in urban areas increase various factors such as because of dense building and population, widespread use of automobiles instead of public transportation, the location of industrial facilities near city centers and the negative effects of land use decisions on the level of air quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%